Distribution of Nominals Under Binding Theory
In the tradition of generative syntax, it is argued that all kinds of nouns can be classified by the combination of two features, and, features which are binary. The binding characteristics of a noun (or its corresponding empty category) are determined by the values of these features, either plus or minus. Thus, a noun that is is a referential-expression R-expr, such as a common noun or proper name. One that is is a pronoun, such as English he or they. is a reflexive, such as himself or themselves.
The actual requirements on where a type of noun can occur are given in three conditions A, B, and C (also referred to as principles).
Condition A states that an anaphor (reflexive) must have a local ("nearby") antecedent (expression that refers to the same entity). Thus, John washed himself obeys Condition A: the antecedent of himself, which is John, is nearby, and both refer to the person "John". In contrast, *John asked Mary to wash himself is unacceptable, because the reflexive and its antecedent are too far away from each other.
Condition B states that a pronoun can have an antecedent, as long as the antecedent is not local (i.e. "far away") or doesn't c-command the pronoun. Thus, John asked Mary to wash him obeys Condition B: John is the antecedent of him, and him is sufficiently far away; on the other hand, *John washed him, where John is intended to be the antecedent of him, is unacceptable.
Condition C states that an R-expression cannot have an antecedent that c-commands it. Thus, *He asked Mary to wash John, with the interpretation that He is the antecedent of John, is unacceptable.
Read more about this topic: Binding (linguistics)
Famous quotes containing the words distribution of, distribution, binding and/or theory:
“Classical and romantic: private language of a family quarrel, a dead dispute over the distribution of emphasis between man and nature.”
—Cyril Connolly (1903–1974)
“My topic for Army reunions ... this summer: How to prepare for war in time of peace. Not by fortifications, by navies, or by standing armies. But by policies which will add to the happiness and the comfort of all our people and which will tend to the distribution of intelligence [and] wealth equally among all. Our strength is a contented and intelligent community.”
—Rutherford Birchard Hayes (1822–1893)
“[Government’s] true strength consists in leaving individuals and states as much as possible to themselves—in making itself felt, not in its power, but in its beneficence, not in its control, but in its protection, not in binding the states more closely to the center, but leaving each to move unobstructed in its proper orbit.”
—Andrew Jackson (1767–1845)
“We commonly say that the rich man can speak the truth, can afford honesty, can afford independence of opinion and action;—and that is the theory of nobility. But it is the rich man in a true sense, that is to say, not the man of large income and large expenditure, but solely the man whose outlay is less than his income and is steadily kept so.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)