Definition
Let V, W and X be three vector spaces over the same base field F. A bilinear map is a function
- B : V × W → X
such that for any w in W the map
- v ↦ B(v, w)
is a linear map from V to X, and for any v in V the map
- w ↦ B(v, w)
is a linear map from W to X.
In other words, if we hold the first entry of the bilinear map fixed, while letting the second entry vary, the result is a linear operator, and similarly if we hold the second entry fixed. Note that if we regard the product V × W as a vector space, then B is not a linear transformation of vector spaces (unless V = 0 or W = 0) because, for example B(2(v,w)) = B(2v,2w) = 2B(v,2w) = 4B(v,w).
If V = W and we have B(v,w) = B(w,v) for all v, w in V, then we say that B is symmetric.
The case where X is F, and we have a bilinear form, is particularly useful (see for example scalar product, inner product and quadratic form).
The definition works without any changes if instead of vector spaces over a field F, we use modules over a commutative ring R. It also can be easily generalized to n-ary functions, where the proper term is multilinear.
For the case of a non-commutative base ring R and a right module MR and a left module RN, we can define a bilinear map B : M × N → T, where T is an abelian group, such that for any n in N, m ↦ B(m, n) is a group homomorphism, and for any m in M, n ↦ B(m, n) is a group homomorphism too, and which also satisfies
- B(mt, n) = B(m, tn)
for all m in M, n in N and t in R.
Read more about this topic: Bilinear Map
Famous quotes containing the word definition:
“Its a rare parent who can see his or her child clearly and objectively. At a school board meeting I attended . . . the only definition of a gifted child on which everyone in the audience could agree was mine.”
—Jane Adams (20th century)
“... if, as women, we accept a philosophy of history that asserts that women are by definition assimilated into the male universal, that we can understand our past through a male lensif we are unaware that women even have a historywe live our lives similarly unanchored, drifting in response to a veering wind of myth and bias.”
—Adrienne Rich (b. 1929)
“It is very hard to give a just definition of love. The most we can say of it is this: that in the soul, it is a desire to rule; in the spirit, it is a sympathy; and in the body, it is but a hidden and subtle desire to possessafter many mysterieswhat one loves.”
—François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (16131680)