Biblical Literalism - History

History

See also: Biblical canon

The high regard for religious scriptures in the Judeo-Christian tradition seems to be related in part to a process of canonization of the Hebrew Bible which occurred over the course of a few centuries from approximately 200 BCE to 200 CE. In the Jewish tradition, the high-regard for the written word represented a direct conduit to the mind of God, and the attendant scholarship that accompanied a literary religion was encouraged in the later Rabbinical School of Judaism. Similarly, the canonization of the New Testament by the Early Christian Church was an important aspect in the formation of the separate religious identity for Christianity. The acceptance or rejection of specific scriptural books was a major indicator of group identity and played a role in determination of excommunications in Christianity and cherem in the Jewish tradition.

In the Reformation, Martin Luther separated the Biblical apocrypha from the rest of the Old Testament books, and later the Westminster Confession demoted them to a status that denied their canonicity. American Protestant literalists and Biblical inerrantists have adopted this truncated Protestant Bible as a work not merely inspired by God but, in fact, representing the Word of God without possibility of error or contradiction.

Read more about this topic:  Biblical Literalism

Famous quotes containing the word history:

    “If usually the “present age” is no very long time, still, at our pleasure, or in the service of some such unity of meaning as the history of civilization, or the study of geology, may suggest, we may conceive the present as extending over many centuries, or over a hundred thousand years.”
    —Josiah Royce (1855–1916)

    “Let it suffice that in the light of these two facts, namely, that the mind is One, and that nature is its correlative, history is to be read and written.”
    —Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    “Postmodernism is, almost by definition, a transitional cusp of social, cultural, economic and ideological history when modernism’s high-minded principles and preoccupations have ceased to function, but before they have been replaced with a totally new system of values. It represents a moment of suspension before the batteries are recharged for the new millennium, an acknowledgment that preceding the future is a strange and hybrid interregnum that might be called the last gasp of the past.”
    —Gilbert Adair, British author, critic. Sunday Times: Books (London, April 21, 1991)