Biblical Criticism - History

History

Part of a series on
The Bible
Biblical canons and books
  • Tanakh
    • Torah
    • Nevi'im
    • Ketuvim
  • Christian biblical canons
  • Old Testament (OT)
  • New Testament (NT)
  • Hebrew Bible
  • Deuterocanon
  • Antilegomena
  • Chapters and verses
  • Apocrypha
    • Jewish
    • OT
    • NT
Development and authorship
  • Authorship
  • Hebrew canon
  • Old Testament canon
  • New Testament canon
  • Mosaic authorship
  • Pauline epistles
  • Johannine works
  • Petrine epistles
Translations and manuscripts
  • Samaritan Torah
  • Dead Sea scrolls
  • Masoretic text
  • Targums
  • Peshitta
  • Septuagint
  • Vulgate
  • Gothic Bible
  • Vetus Latina
  • Luther Bible
  • English Bibles
Biblical studies
  • Dating the Bible
  • Biblical criticism
  • Historical criticism
  • Textual criticism
  • Source criticism
  • Form criticism
  • Redaction criticism
  • Canonical criticism
  • Novum Testamentum Graece
  • Documentary hypothesis
  • Wiseman hypothesis
  • Synoptic problem
  • NT textual categories
  • Historicity
  • People
  • Places
  • Names
  • Internal consistency
  • Archeology
  • Artifacts
  • Science and the Bible
Interpretation
  • Hermeneutics
  • Pesher
  • Midrash
  • Pardes
  • Allegorical interpretation
  • Literalism
  • Prophecy
  • Inspiration
Perspectives
  • Gnostic
  • Islamic
  • Qur'anic
  • Christianity and Judaism
  • Inerrancy
  • Infallibility
  • Criticism of the Bible
  • Bible book
  • Bible portal

Both Old Testament and New Testament criticism originated in the rationalism of the 17th and 18th centuries and developed within the context of the scientific approach to the humanities (especially history) which grew during the 19th. Studies of the Old and New Testaments were often independent of each other, largely due to the difficulty of any single scholar having a sufficient grasp of the many languages required or of the cultural background for the different periods in which texts had their origins.

Read more about this topic:  Biblical Criticism

Famous quotes containing the word history:

    No one can understand Paris and its history who does not understand that its fierceness is the balance and justification of its frivolity. It is called a city of pleasure; but it may also very specially be called a city of pain. The crown of roses is also a crown of thorns. Its people are too prone to hurt others, but quite ready also to hurt themselves. They are martyrs for religion, they are martyrs for irreligion; they are even martyrs for immorality.
    Gilbert Keith Chesterton (1874–1936)

    Considered in its entirety, psychoanalysis won’t do. It’s an end product, moreover, like a dinosaur or a zeppelin; no better theory can ever be erected on its ruins, which will remain for ever one of the saddest and strangest of all landmarks in the history of twentieth-century thought.
    Peter B. Medawar (1915–1987)

    We know only a single science, the science of history. One can look at history from two sides and divide it into the history of nature and the history of men. However, the two sides are not to be divided off; as long as men exist the history of nature and the history of men are mutually conditioned.
    Karl Marx (1818–1883)