Axial Multipole Moments - General Axial Multipole Moments

General Axial Multipole Moments

To get the general axial multipole moments, we replace the point charge of the previous section with an infinitesimal charge element, where represents the charge density at position on the z-axis. If the radius r of the observation point P is greater than the largest for which is significant (denoted ), the electric potential may be written

$\Phi(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon} \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} M_{k} \left( \frac{1}{r^{k+1}} \right) P_{k}(\cos \theta )$

where the axial multipole moments are defined

$M_{k} \equiv \int d\zeta \ \lambda(\zeta) \zeta^{k}$

Special cases include the axial monopole moment (=total charge)

$M_{0} \equiv \int d\zeta \ \lambda(\zeta)$ ,

the axial dipole moment, and the axial quadrupole moment . Each successive term in the expansion varies inversely with a greater power of, e.g., the monopole potential varies as, the dipole potential varies as, the quadrupole potential varies as, etc. Thus, at large distances, the potential is well-approximated by the leading nonzero multipole term.

The lowest non-zero axial multipole moment is invariant under a shift b in origin, but higher moments generally depend on the choice of origin. The shifted multipole moments would be

$M_{k}^{\prime} \equiv \int d\zeta \ \lambda(\zeta) \ \left(\zeta + b \right)^{k}$

Expanding the polynomial under the integral

$\left( \zeta + b \right)^{l} = \zeta^{l} + l b \zeta^{l-1} + \ldots + l \zeta b^{l-1} + b^{l}$

leads to the equation

$M_{k}^{\prime} = M_{k} + l b M_{k-1} + \ldots + l b^{l-1} M_{1} + b^{l} M_{0}$

If the lower moments are zero, then . The same equation shows that multipole moments higher than the first non-zero moment do depend on the choice of origin (in general).

Read more about this topic: Axial Multipole Moments

Famous quotes containing the words general and/or moments:

“‘A thing is called by a certain name because it instantiates a certain universal’ is obviously circular when particularized, but it looks imposing when left in this general form. And it looks imposing in this general form largely because of the inveterate philosophical habit of treating the shadows cast by words and sentences as if they were separately identifiable. Universals, like facts and propositions, are such shadows.”
—David Pears (b. 1921)

“Revolutions are notorious for allowing even non- participants—even women!—new scope for telling the truth since they are themselves such massive moments of truth, moments of such massive participation.”
—Selma James (b. 1930)