Definition
An n-class association scheme consists of a set X together with a partition S of X × X into n + 1 binary relations, R0, R1, ..., Rn which satisfy:
- and is called the Identity relation.
- Defining, if R in S, then R* in S
- If, the number of such that and is a constant depending on, but not on the particular choice of and .
An association scheme is commutative if for all, and . Most authors assume this property.
A symmetric association scheme is one in which each relation is a symmetric relation. That is:
- if (x,y) ∈ Ri, then (y,x) ∈ Ri . (Or equivalently, R* = R.)
Every symmetric association scheme is commutative.
Note, however, that while the notion of an association scheme generalizes the notion of a group, the notion of a commutative association scheme only generalizes the notion of a commutative group.
Two points x and y are called i th associates if . The definition states that if x and y are i th associates so are y and x. Every pair of points are i th associates for exactly one . Each point is its own zeroth associate while distinct points are never zeroth associates. If x and y are k th associates then the number of points which are both i th associates of and j th associates of is a constant .
Read more about this topic: Association Scheme
Famous quotes containing the word definition:
“Perhaps the best definition of progress would be the continuing efforts of men and women to narrow the gap between the convenience of the powers that be and the unwritten charter.”
—Nadine Gordimer (b. 1923)
“According to our social pyramid, all men who feel displaced racially, culturally, and/or because of economic hardships will turn on those whom they feel they can order and humiliate, usually women, children, and animals—just as they have been ordered and humiliated by those privileged few who are in power. However, this definition does not explain why there are privileged men who behave this way toward women.”
—Ana Castillo (b. 1953)
“It’s a rare parent who can see his or her child clearly and objectively. At a school board meeting I attended . . . the only definition of a gifted child on which everyone in the audience could agree was “mine.””
—Jane Adams (20th century)