Potential Global Impact
Being a renewable and carbon-neutral source of solar fuels, producing either hydrogen or carbohydrates, artificial photosynthesis is set apart from other popular renewable energy sources, specifically hydroelectric, solar photovoltaic, geothermal, and wind — which produce electricity directly with no fuel intermediate. As such, artificial photosynthesis may become a very important source of fuel for transportation. Unlike biomass energy, it does not require arable land and, consequently, will not compete with the food supply.
At the fifteenth meeting of the International Congress of Photosynthesis Research (ISPR) in Beijing 27 August 2010, a proposal was made for a "macroscience" Global Artificial Photosynthesis (GAP) Project, with seven models being presented for evaluation. An international conference on the subject took place between the fourteenth and eighteenth of August 2011 at Lord Howe Island under the auspices of the UNESCO Natural Sciences Sector. The meeting featured presentations from both scientists and non-scientific members of the society from across the globe, such as Peidong Yang, Dan Nocera and Michael Kirby and the papers presented have now been edited for a special open-source edition of the Australian Journal of Chemistry. It has been argued that photosynthesis in its natural and artificial forms should be declared common heritage of humanity under international law and that global artificial photosynthesis should be considered the moral culmination of nanotechnology.
Read more about this topic: Artificial Photosynthesis
Famous quotes containing the words potential, global and/or impact:
“Most days I feel like an acrobat high above a crowd out of which my own parents, my in-laws, potential employers, phantoms of “other women who do it” and a thousand faceless eyes stare up.”
—Anonymous Mother. Ourselves and Our Children, by Boston Women’s Health Book Collective, ch. 2 (1978)
“As the global expansion of Indian and Chinese restaurants suggests, xenophobia is directed against foreign people, not foreign cultural imports.”
—Eric J. Hobsbawm (b. 1917)
“As in political revolutions, so in paradigm choice—there is no standard higher than the assent of the relevant community. To discover how scientific revolutions are effected, we shall therefore have to examine not only the impact of nature and of logic, but also the techniques of persuasive argumentation effective within the quite special groups that constitute the community of scientists.”
—Thomas S. Kuhn (b. 1922)