Formal Statement of The Theorem
Let be a set of outcomes, a number of voters or decision criteria. We shall denote the set of all full linear orderings of by .
A (strict) social welfare function (preference aggregation rule) is a function which aggregates voters' preferences into a single preference order on . The -tuple of voters' preferences is called a preference profile. In its strongest and simplest form, Arrow's impossibility theorem states that whenever the set of possible alternatives has more than 2 elements, then the following three conditions become incompatible:
- unanimity, or Pareto efficiency
- If alternative a is ranked above b for all orderings, then a is ranked higher than b by . (Note that unanimity implies non-imposition).
- non-dictatorship
- There is no individual i whose preferences always prevail. That is, there is no such that .
- independence of irrelevant alternatives
- For two preference profiles and such that for all individuals i, alternatives a and b have the same order in as in, alternatives a and b have the same order in as in .
Read more about this topic: Arrow's Impossibility Theorem
Famous quotes containing the words formal, statement and/or theorem:
“The manifestation of poetry in external life is formal perfection. True sentiment grows within, and art must represent internal phenomena externally.”
—Franz Grillparzer (1791–1872)
“The force of truth that a statement imparts, then, its prominence among the hordes of recorded observations that I may optionally apply to my own life, depends, in addition to the sense that it is argumentatively defensible, on the sense that someone like me, and someone I like, whose voice is audible and who is at least notionally in the same room with me, does or can possibly hold it to be compellingly true.”
—Nicholson Baker (b. 1957)
“To insure the adoration of a theorem for any length of time, faith is not enough, a police force is needed as well.”
—Albert Camus (1913–1960)