Division
For classical Arabic grammarians, the grammatical sciences are divided into five branches:
- al-luġah اللغة (language/lexicon) concerned with collecting and explaining vocabulary
- at-taṣrīf التصريف (morphology) determining the form of the individual words
- an-naḥw النحو (syntax) primarily concerned with inflection (ʾiʿrāb) which had already been lost in dialects.
- al-ištiqāq الاشتقاق (derivation) examining the origin of the words
- al-balāġah البلاغة (rhetoric) which elucidates construct quality
The grammar or grammars of contemporary varieties of Arabic are a different question. Said M. Badawi, an expert on Arabic grammar, divided Arabic grammar into five different types based on the speaker's level of literacy and the degree to which the speaker deviated from Classical Arabic. Badawi's five types of grammar from the most colloquial to the most formal are Illiterate Spoken Arabic (عامية الأميين ʿāmmiyyat al-ʾummiyyīn), Semi-literate Spoken Arabic (عامية المتنورين ʿāmmiyat al-mutanawwirīn), Educated Spoken Arabic (عامية المثقفين ʿāmmiyyat al-muṯaqqafīn), Modern Standard Arabic (فصحى العصر fuṣḥā l-ʿaṣr), and Classical Arabic (فصحى التراث fuṣḥā t-turāṯ). This article is concerned with the grammar of Classical Arabic and Modern Standard Arabic exclusively.
Read more about this topic: Arabic Grammar
Famous quotes containing the word division:
“For a small child there is no division between playing and learning; between the things he or she does “just for fun” and things that are “educational.” The child learns while living and any part of living that is enjoyable is also play.”
—Penelope Leach (20th century)
“The glory of the farmer is that, in the division of labors, it is his part to create. All trade rests at last on his primitive activity.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)
“Affection, indulgence, and humor alike are powerless against the instinct of children to rebel. It is essential to their minds and their wills as exercise is to their bodies. If they have no reasons, they will invent them, like nations bound on war. It is hard to imagine families limp enough always to be at peace. Wherever there is character there will be conflict. The best that children and parents can hope for is that the wounds of their conflict may not be too deep or too lasting.”
—New York State Division of Youth Newsletter (20th century)