Decision
In the plurality opinion, which was co-signed by Justices Gerry L. Alexander and Charles W. Johnson, Justice Barbara Madsen wrote that “Under this standard, DOMA is constitutional because the legislature was entitled to believe that limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples furthers procreation, essential to the survival of the human race, and furthers the well-being of children by encouraging families where children are reared in homes headed by the children’s biological parents.” Justice Gerry L. Alexander issued a separate concurring opinion, further emphasizing the possibility that the legislature or people could expand the definition of marriage in the state. Justice James M. Johnson also issued a separate opinion, co-signed by Justice Richard B. Sanders, which concurred in judgment only. This opinion suggested that the judges' rulings in the lower courts, which held DOMA to be unconstitutional, were result-oriented and disregarded the law. The reasoning in Madsen's plurality opinion is similar to that found in the Hernandez v. Robles decision, which was handed down on July 6, 2006, from New York’s highest court.
The four justices that dissented accused the majority of relying upon “circular reasoning” in formulating their opinion. In the main dissenting opinion, co-signed by Justices Tom Chambers, Susan Owens and Bobbe J. Bridge, Justice Mary Fairhurst asked, “Would giving same-sex couples the same right that opposite-sex couples enjoy injure the state’s interest in procreation and healthy child rearing?” Justice Tom Chambers issued a separate dissenting opinion co-signed by Justice Susan Owens, while Justice Bobbe J. Bridge issued yet another dissenting opinion.
Read more about this topic: Andersen V. King County
Famous quotes containing the word decision:
“Our decision about energy will test the character of the American people and the ability of the President and the Congress to govern this nation. This difficult effort will be the “moral equivalent of war,” except that we will be uniting our efforts to build and not to destroy.”
—Jimmy Carter (James Earl Carter, Jr.)
“Because of these convictions, I made a personal decision in the 1964 Presidential campaign to make education a fundamental issue and to put it high on the nation’s agenda. I proposed to act on my belief that regardless of a family’s financial condition, education should be available to every child in the United States—as much education as he could absorb.”
—Lyndon Baines Johnson (1908–1973)
“Once the decision has been reached, close your ears even to the best counter-argument: a sign of strong character. Thus an occasional will to stupidity.”
—Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900)