Election Results
Scottish Parliament election, 2007: Aberdeen South | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
Liberal Democrats | Nicol Stephen | 10,843 | 36.3 | -9.6 | |
SNP | Maureen Watt | 8,111 | 27.1 | +12.8 | |
Labour | Rami Okasha | 5,499 | 18.4 | -0.9 | |
Conservative | David Davidson | 5,432 | 18.2 | +0.8 | |
Majority | 2,731 | 9.1 | |||
Turnout | 29,885 | 52.7 | +1.0 | ||
Liberal Democrats hold | Swing | -11.2% |
Scottish Parliament election, 2003: Aberdeen South | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
Liberal Democrats | Nicol Stephen | 13,821 | 45.9 | +13.3 | |
Labour | Richard Baker | 5,805 | 19.3 | -8.2 | |
Conservative | Ian Duncan | 5,230 | 17.4 | -2.8 | |
SNP | Maureen Watt | 4,315 | 14.3 | -4.8 | |
Scottish Socialist | Keith Farnsworth | 953 | 3.2 | N/A | |
Majority | 8,016 | 26.6 | |||
Turnout | 30,124 | 51.8 | |||
Liberal Democrats hold | Swing | +10.8 |
Scottish Parliament election, 1999: Aberdeen South | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
Liberal Democrats | Nicol Stephen | 11,300 | 32.6 | N/A | |
Labour | Mike Elrick | 9,540 | 27.5 | N/A | |
Conservative | Nanette Milne | 6,993 | 20.2 | N/A | |
SNP | Irene McGugan | 6,651 | 19.2 | N/A | |
Socialist Workers | Scott Sutherland | 206 | 0.6 | N/A | |
Majority | 1,760 | 6.1 | |||
Turnout | 28,690 | ||||
Liberal Democrats hold | Swing |
Read more about this topic: Aberdeen South (Scottish Parliament Constituency)
Famous quotes containing the words election and/or results:
“Last evening attended Croghan Lodge International Order of Odd Fellows. Election of officers. Chosen Noble Grand. These social organizations have a number of good results. All who attend are educated in self-government. This in a marked way. They bind society together. The well-to-do and the poor should be brought together as much as possible. The separation into classescastesis our danger. It is the danger of all civilizations.”
—Rutherford Birchard Hayes (18221893)
“There is not a single rule, however plausible, and however firmly grounded in epistemology, that is not violated at some time or other. It becomes evident that such violations are not accidental events, they are not results of insufficient knowledge or of inattention which might have been avoided. On the contrary, we see that they are necessary for progress.”
—Paul Feyerabend (19241994)