Point and Spatial Realization of Automorphisms
Many problems in ergodic theory reduce to problems about automorphisms of abelian von Neumann algebras. In that regard, the following results are useful:
Theorem. Suppose μ, ν are standard measures on X, Y respectively. Then any involutive isomorphism
which is weak*-bicontinuous corresponds to a point transformation in the following sense: There are Borel null subsets M of X and N of Y and a Borel isomorphism
such that
- η carries the measure μ into a measure μ' on Y which is equivalent to ν in the sense that μ' and ν have the same sets of measure zero;
- η realizes the transformation Φ, that is
Note that in general we cannot expect η to carry μ into ν.
The next result concerns unitary transformations which induce a weak*-bicontinuous isomorphism between abelian von Neumann algebras.
Theorem. Suppose μ, ν are standard measures on X, Y and
for measurable families of Hilbert spaces {Hx}x ∈ X, {Ky}y ∈ Y. If U : H → K is a unitary such that
then there is an almost everywhere defined Borel point transformation η : X → Y as in the previous theorem and a measurable family {Ux}x ∈ X of unitary operators
such that
where the expression in square root sign is the Radon–Nikodym derivative of μ η−1 with respect to ν. The statement follows combining the theorem on point realization of automorphisms stated above with the theorem characterizing the algebra of diagonalizable operators stated in the article on direct integrals.
Read more about this topic: Abelian Von Neumann Algebra
Famous quotes containing the words point and/or realization:
“All Coolidge had to do in 1924 was to keep his mean trap shut, to be elected. All Harding had to do in 1920 was repeat Avoid foreign entanglements. All Hoover had to do in 1928 was to endorse Coolidge. All Roosevelt had to do in 1932 was to point to Hoover.”
—Robert E. Sherwood (18961955)
“A completely indifferent attitude toward clothes in women seems to me to be an admission of inferiority, of perverseness, or of a lack of realization of her place in the world as a woman. Orwhat is even more hopeless and patheticits an admission that she has given up, that she is beaten, and refuses longer to stand up to the world.”
—Hortense Odlum (1892?)