42nd Infantry Division (United States) - Current Structure

Current Structure

42nd Infantry Division exercises training and readiness oversight of the following units, but they are not organic:

  • Special Troops Battalion
  • 27th (Infantry) Brigade Combat Team (NY NG)
    • Special Troops Battalion
    • 2nd Squadron, 101st Cavalry Regiment (RSTA)
    • 1st Battalion, 69th Infantry Regiment
    • 2nd Battalion, 108th Infantry Regiment
    • 1st Battalion, 258th Field Artillery Regiment
    • 427th Brigade Support Battalion
  • 50th (Infantry) Brigade Combat Team (NJ NG)
    • Special Troops Battalion
    • 1st Squadron, 102nd Cavalry Regiment
    • 2nd Battalion, 113th Infantry Regiment
    • 1st Battalion, 114th Infantry Regiment
    • 3rd Battalion, 112th Field Artillery Regiment
    • 250th Brigade Support Battalion
  • 86th (Infantry) Brigade Combat Team (Mountain) (VT NG)
    • Special Troops Battalion
    • 1st Squadron, 172nd Cavalry Regiment (RSTA)
    • 1st Battalion, 102nd Infantry Regiment (Mountain) (CT NG)
    • 3rd Battalion, 172nd Infantry Regiment (Mountain) (VT NG, NH NG, ME NG, RI NG)
    • 1st Battalion, 101st Field Artillery Regiment (MA NG & VT NG)
    • 186th Brigade Support Battalion
  • Combat Aviation Brigade, 42nd Infantry Division (NY NG)
    • Headquarters and Headquarters Company
    • 3rd Battalion (General Support), 126th Aviation Regiment (MA NG)
    • 1st Battalion (Attack/Recon), 151st Aviation Regiment
    • 3rd Battalion (Assault), 142nd Aviation Regiment
    • 1st Battalion (S&S), 224th Aviation Regiment (MD NG)
    • 642nd Aviation Support Battalion

Read more about this topic:  42nd Infantry Division (United States)

Famous quotes containing the words current and/or structure:

    “The first opinion that occurs to us when we are suddenly asked about something is usually not our own but only the current one pertaining to our class, position, or parentage; our own opinions seldom swim on the surface.”
    —Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900)

    “There is no such thing as a language, not if a language is anything like what many philosophers and linguists have supposed. There is therefore no such thing to be learned, mastered, or born with. We must give up the idea of a clearly defined shared structure which language-users acquire and then apply to cases.”
    —Donald Davidson (b. 1917)