Current Structure
34th Infantry Division exercises Training and Readiness Oversight of the following elements, they cannot be considered organic:
- Main Command Post (MCP)
- Special Troops Battalion (STB)
- 1st Heavy Brigade Combat Team (MN NG)
- Special Troops Battalion
- 1st Squadron, 94th Cavalry Regiment (Armored Recon)
- 1st Battalion, 194th Armor Regiment (Combined Arms)
- 2nd Battalion, 136th Infantry Regiment (United States) (Combined Arms)
- 1st Battalion, 125th Field Artillery Regiment
- 134th Brigade Support Battalion
- 2nd Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IA NG)
- Special Troops Battalion
- 1st Squadron, 113th Cavalry Regiment (RSTA) (IA NG)
- 1st Battalion, 133rd Infantry Regiment (IA NG)
- 1st Battalion, 168th Infantry Regiment (IA NG)
- 1st Battalion, 194th Field Artillery Regiment
- 334th Brigade Support Battalion
- 32nd Infantry Brigade Combat Team (WI NG)
- Special Troops Battalion
- 1st Squadron, 105th Cavalry Regiment (RSTA)
- 2nd Battalion, 127th Infantry Regiment
- 1st Battalion, 128th Infantry Regiment
- 1st Battalion, 120th Field Artillery Regiment
- 132nd Brigade Support Battalion
- 116th Cavalry Brigade Combat Team (ID NG)
- Special Troops Battalion
- 2nd Squadron, 116th Cavalry Regiment (Armored Recon) (ID NG)
- 1st Squadron, 163rd Cavalry Regiment (Combined Arms) (MT NG)
- 3rd Squadron, 116th Cavalry Regiment (Combined Arms) (OR NG)
- 1st Battalion, 148th Field Artillery Regiment (ID NG)
- 145th Brigade Support Battalion (ID NG)
- Combat Aviation Brigade, 34th Infantry Division (MN NG)
- Headquarters & Headquarters Company
- 1st Battalion, 113th Aviation Regiment (Support & Security) (ND NG)
- 2nd Battalion, 147th Aviation Regiment (Assault) (MN NG)
- 1st Battalion, 183rd Aviation Regiment (Attack) (ID NG)
- 1st Battalion, 189th Aviation Regiment (General Support) (MT NG)
- 834th Aviation Support Battalion (MN NG)
Read more about this topic: 34th Infantry Division (United States)
Famous quotes containing the words current and/or structure:
“We hear the haunting presentiment of a dutiful middle age in the current reluctance of young people to select any option except the one they feel will impinge upon them the least.”
—Gail Sheehy (b. 1937)
“Why does philosophy use concepts and why does faith use symbols if both try to express the same ultimate? The answer, of course, is that the relation to the ultimate is not the same in each case. The philosophical relation is in principle a detached description of the basic structure in which the ultimate manifests itself. The relation of faith is in principle an involved expression of concern about the meaning of the ultimate for the faithful.”
—Paul Tillich (18861965)