2003 Speedway World Cup Final - Heat Details

Heat Details

1 Sweden 62 0 4 6 8 11 15 17 18 21 25 26 26 29 31 31 35 35 37 45 49 50 52 55 59 62
(1) Andreas Jonsson 12 0 3 3 4 2
(2) Mikael Max 25 4 4 2 4 8J 3
(3) Peter Ljung 10 2 4 0 0 4
(4) Peter Karlsson 10 2 2 1 2 3
(5) David Ruud 5 3 1 0 - 1
2 Australia 57 4 7 7 10 14 15 19 23 25 25 25 28 32 36 40 42 46 50 50 52 54 54 55 56 57
(1) Jason Crump 17 4 4 4 4 1
(2) Todd Wiltshire 15 3 2 4 4 2
(3) Jason Lyons 0 X X X 0 0
(4) Ryan Sullivan 10 3 1 3 2 1
(5) Leigh Adams 15 4 4 4 2 1
3 Denmark 53 3 4 8 9 11 13 13 15 15 18 22 23 25 26 27 28 31 34 36 36 40 48 50 53 53
(1) Nicki Pedersen 21 3 3 1 3 8J 3
(2) Hans N. Andersen 7 1 2 2 2 0
(3) Bjarne Pedersen 9 4 0 1 X 4
(4) Ronni Pedersen 4 1 2 - 1 -
(5) Charlie Gjedde 12 2 X 4 1 3 2
4 Poland 49 2 4 5 9 10 13 16 16 17 18 21 25 25 25 27 27 28 28 31 32 38 41 45 45 49
(1) Tomasz Gollob 20 2 3 2 3 6J 4
(2) Tomasz Bajerski 6 2 0 3 1 0
(3) Jarosław Hampel 13 1 1 4 0 3 4
(4) Sebastian Ułamek 6 4 1 0 1 -
(5) Piotr Protasiewicz 4 1 3 X 0 -
5 Great Britain 44 1 1 4 4 4 4 5 8 16 18 20 22 23 26 29 32 34 35 36 39 39 40 40 42 44
(1) Gary Havelock 3 1 0 2 - X
(2) Dean Barker 6 0 1 2 2 1
(3) David Norris 8 3 3 1 1 0
(4) Lee Richardson 14 0 8J 3 1 2
(5) Scott Nicholls 13 0 2 3 3 3 2

Helmet colours was permanent for each teams (Red, Blue, White, Yellow/Black and Green). Colours in diagrams means gate positions:
gate A – inside gate B gate C gate D gate E – outside

Read more about this topic:  2003 Speedway World Cup Final

Famous quotes containing the words heat and/or details:

    For my part, when I enter most intimately into what I call myself, I always stumble on some particular perception or other, of heat or cold, light or shade, love or hatred, pain or pleasure. I never can catch myself at any time without a perception, and never can observe anything but the perception.
    David Hume (1711–1776)

    There was a time when the average reader read a novel simply for the moral he could get out of it, and however naïve that may have been, it was a good deal less naïve than some of the limited objectives he has now. Today novels are considered to be entirely concerned with the social or economic or psychological forces that they will by necessity exhibit, or with those details of daily life that are for the good novelist only means to some deeper end.
    Flannery O’Connor (1925–1964)