2002 Speedway World Cup Event 3 - Heat Details

Heat Details

1 Poland 66 2 5 8 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 33 34 36 38 41 41 44 44 45 48 51 54 66
(1) Tomasz Gollob 7 2 3 2 X 7
(2) Piotr Protasiewicz 13 3 3 1 3 10 3
(3) Jarosław Hampel 14 3 3 2 3 11 3
(4) Krzysztof Cegielski 11 2 3 3 T 8 3
(5) Grzegorz Walasek 12 3 3 2 1 9 3
2 United States 49 3 4 6 9 11 11 13 15 16 17 21 24 27 30 33 33 36 37 40 43 45 47 47 49
(1) Greg Hancock 17 3 2 4J 3 3 15 2
(2) Brent Werner 7 1 0 3 1 5 2
(3) Billy Hamill 11 3 2 3 3 11 X
(4) Ryan Fisher 3 2 1 - X 3
(5) Billy Janniro 11 2 1 3 3 9 2
3 Russia 24 1 3 4 4 5 9 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 13 13 15 17 17 19 19 20 21 23 24
(1) Roman Povazhny 8 1 4J 0 2 7 1
(2) Sergey Kuzin 2 0 1 M 0 1 1
(3) Sergey Darkin 8 2 2 0 0 2 6 2
(4) Denis Saifutdinov 5 1 0 1 2 0 4 1
(5) Eduard Shaihullin 1 1 0 - - 1
4 Slovenia 19 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 5 6 7 9 9 10 11 12 16 17 19 19 19 19 19
(1) Denis Štojs 1 0 - - 1 1
(2) Matej Žagar 5 0 0 1 4J 5 F
(3) Ales Dolinar 1 0 X 0 1 1 0
(4) Izak Šantej 6 1 1 1 2 1 6 0
(5) Jernej Kolenko 6 0 1 2 1 2 6 X

Helmet colours was permanent for each teams (Red, Blue, White and Yellow/Black). Colours in diagrams means gate positions:
gate A – inside gate B gate C gate D – outside

Read more about this topic:  2002 Speedway World Cup Event 3

Famous quotes containing the words heat and/or details:

    I remember my youth and the feeling that will never come back any more—the feeling that I could last for ever, outlast the sea, the earth, and all men; the deceitful feeling that lures us on to joys, to perils, to love, to vain effort—to death; the triumphant conviction of strength, the heat of life in the handful of dust, the glow in the heart that with every year grows dim, grows cold, grows small, and expires—and expires, too soon, too soon—before life itself.
    Joseph Conrad (1857–1924)

    There was a time when the average reader read a novel simply for the moral he could get out of it, and however naïve that may have been, it was a good deal less naïve than some of the limited objectives he has now. Today novels are considered to be entirely concerned with the social or economic or psychological forces that they will by necessity exhibit, or with those details of daily life that are for the good novelist only means to some deeper end.
    Flannery O’Connor (1925–1964)