2002 New England Patriots Season - Final Roster

Final Roster

New England Patriots 2002 final roster
Quarterbacks
  • 12 Tom Brady
  • 6 Rohan Davey R
  • 19 Damon Huard

Running Backs

  • 44 Marc Edwards FB
  • 33 Kevin Faulk KR/PR
  • 35 Patrick Pass FB
  • 21 J. R. Redmond
  • 32 Antowain Smith

Wide Receivers

  • 83 Deion Branch R
  • 80 Troy Brown PR
  • 84 Fred Coleman
  • 87 David Givens R
  • 81 Donald Hayes
  • 86 David Patten

Tight Ends

  • 49 Fred Baxter
  • 85 Cam Cleeland
  • 88 Christian Fauria
 Offensive Linemen
  • 63 Joe Andruzzi G
  • 68 Tom Ashworth T
  • 77 Mike Compton G
  • 71 Russ Hochstein G
  • 74 Kenyatta Jones T/G
  • 70 Adrian Klemm T
  • 62 Matt Knutson T UR
  • 72 Matt Light T
  • 64 Greg Robinson-Randall T
  • 67 Grey Ruegamer C/G
  • 65 Damien Woody C

Defensive Linemen

  • 97 Jarvis Green DE R
  • 91 Bobby Hamilton DE/DT
  • 99 Bernard Holsey DT
  • 96 Rick Lyle DT/DE
  • 55 Willie McGinest DE
  • 98 Anthony Pleasant DE
  • 93 Richard Seymour DT
 Linebackers
  • 54 Tedy Bruschi ILB
  • 53 Larry Izzo OLB
  • 52 Ted Johnson ILB
  • 95 Roman Phifer OLB
  • 59 Maugaula Tuitele ILB
  • 50 Mike Vrabel OLB

Defensive Backs

  • 22 Terrell Buckley CB
  • 30 Je'Rod Cherry FS
  • 27 Victor Green SS
  • 23 Antwan Harris FS
  • 29 Chris Hayes FS
  • 34 Tebucky Jones FS
  • 24 Ty Law CB
  • 36 Lawyer Milloy SS
  • 25 Leonard Myers CB

Special Teams

  • 66 Lonie Paxton LS
  • 4 Adam Vinatieri K
  • 13 Ken Walter P
 Reserve Lists
  • 58 Matt Chatham OLB
  • 75 Mike Clare C
  • 82 Daniel Graham TE R
  • 31 Ben Kelly CB
  • 37 Rob Kelly FS
  • 61 Stephen Neal G
  • 45 Otis Smith CB
  • 42 Antwoine Womack RB R


Practice Squad

  • 75 Maurice Anderson DT
  • 28 Dyshod Carter CB
  • 76 Brandon Gorin OT
  • 94 Ken Kocher DT UR
  • 16 Scott McCready WR

Read more about this topic:  2002 New England Patriots Season

Famous quotes containing the word final:

    “It is in the nature of allegory, as opposed to symbolism, to beg the question of absolute reality. The allegorist avails himself of a formal correspondence between “ideas” and “things,” both of which he assumes as given; he need not inquire whether either sphere is “real” or whether, in the final analysis, reality consists in their interaction.”
    —Charles, Jr. Feidelson, U.S. educator, critic. Symbolism and American Literature, ch. 1, University of Chicago Press (1953)