Zonal Spherical Function - Complex Case

Complex Case

If G is a complex semisimple Lie group, it is the complexification of its maximal compact subgroup K. If {\mathfrak
g} and are their Lie algebras, then

Let T be a maximal torus in K with Lie algebra . Then

Let

be the Weyl group of T in K. Recall characters in Hom(T,T) are called weights and can be identified with elements of the weight lattice Λ in Hom(, R) = . There is a natural ordering on weights and very finite-dimensional irreducible representation (π, V) of K has a unique highest weight λ. The weights of the adjoint representation of K on are called roots and ρ is used to denote half the sum of the positive roots α, Weyl's character formula asserts that for z = exp X in T

where, for μ in, Aμ denotes the antisymmetrisation

and ε denotes the sign character of the finite reflection group W.

Weyl's denominator formula expresses the denominator Aρ as a product:

where the product is over the positive roots.

Weyl's dimension formula asserts that

where the inner product on is that associated with the Killing form on .

Now

  • every irreducible representation of K extends holomorphically to the complexification G
  • every irreducible character χλ(k) of K extends holomorphically to the complexification of K and .
  • for every λ in Hom(A,T) =, there is a zonal spherical function φλ.

The Berezin–Harish–Chandra formula asserts that for X in

In other words:

  • the zonal spherical functions on a complex semisimple Lie group are given by analytic continuation of the formula for the normalised characters.

One of the simplest proofs of this formula involves the radial component on A of the Laplacian on G, a proof formally parallel to Helgason's reworking of Freudenthal's classical proof of the Weyl character formula, using the radial component on T of the Laplacian on K.

In the latter case the class functions on K can be identified with W-invariant functions on T. The radial component of ΔK on T is just the expression for the restriction of ΔK to W-invariant functions on T, where it is given by the formula

where

for X in . If χ is a character with highest weight λ, it follows that φ = h·χ satisfies

Thus for every weight μ with non-zero Fourier coefficient in φ,

The classical argument of Freudenthal shows that μ + ρ must have the form s(λ + ρ) for some s in W, so the character formula follows from the antisymmetry of φ.

Similarly K-biinvariant functions on G can be identified with W(A)-invariant functions on A. The radial component of ΔG on A is just the expression for the restriction of ΔG to W(A)-invariant functions on A. It is given by the formula

where

for X in .

The Berezin–Harish–Chandra formula for a zonal spherical function φ can be established by introducing the antisymmetric function

which is an eigenfunction of the Laplacian ΔA. Since K is generated by copies of subgroups that are homomorphic images of SU(2) corresponding to simple roots, its complexification G is generated by the corresponding homomorphic images of SL(2,C). The formula for zonal spherical functions of SL(2,C) implies that f is a periodic function on with respect to some sublattice. Antisymmetry under the Weyl group and the argument of Freudenthal again imply that ψ must have the stated form up to a multiplicative constant, which can be determined using the Weyl dimension formula.

Read more about this topic:  Zonal Spherical Function

Famous quotes containing the words complex and/or case:

    All propaganda or popularization involves a putting of the complex into the simple, but such a move is instantly deconstructive. For if the complex can be put into the simple, then it cannot be as complex as it seemed in the first place; and if the simple can be an adequate medium of such complexity, then it cannot after all be as simple as all that.
    Terry Eagleton (b. 1943)

    Massachusetts sat waiting Mr. Loring’s decision.... It was really the trial of Massachusetts. Every moment that she hesitated to set this man free, every moment that she now hesitates to atone for her crime, she is convicted. The commissioner on her case is God; not Edward G. God, but simply God.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)