Weil Conjectures - Statement of The Weil Conjectures

Statement of The Weil Conjectures

Suppose that X is a non-singular n-dimensional projective algebraic variety over the field Fq with q elements. The zeta function ζ(X, s) of X is by definition

where Nm is the number of points of X defined over the degree m extension Fqm of Fq.

The Weil conjectures state:

  1. (Rationality) ζ(X, s) is a rational function of T = q−s. More precisely, ζ(X, s) can be written as a finite alternating product
    where each Pi(T) is an integral polynomial. Furthermore, P0(T) = 1 − T, P2n(T) = 1 − qnT, and for 1 ≤ i ≤ 2n − 1, Pi(T) factors over C as for some numbers αij.
  2. (Functional equation and Poincaré duality) The zeta function satisfies
    or equivalently
    where E is the Euler characteristic of X. In particular, for each i, the numbers α2n-i,1, α2n-i,2, … equal the numbers qni,1, qni,2, … in some order.
  3. (Riemann hypothesis) |αi,j| = qi/2 for all 1 ≤ i ≤ 2n − 1 and all j. This implies that all zeros of Pk(T) lie on the "critical line" of complex numbers s with real part k/2.
  4. (Betti numbers) If X is a (good) "reduction mod p" of a non-singular projective variety Y defined over a number field embedded in the field of complex numbers, then the degree of Pi is the ith Betti number of the space of complex points of Y.

Read more about this topic:  Weil Conjectures

Famous quotes containing the words statement of, statement, weil and/or conjectures:

    Eroticism has its own moral justification because it says that pleasure is enough for me; it is a statement of the individual’s sovereignty.
    Mario Vargas Llosa (b. 1936)

    Truth is that concordance of an abstract statement with the ideal limit towards which endless investigation would tend to bring scientific belief, which concordance the abstract statement may possess by virtue of the confession of its inaccuracy and one-sidedness, and this confession is an essential ingredient of truth.
    Charles Sanders Peirce (1839–1914)

    With no matter what human being, taken individually, I always find reasons for concluding that sorrow and misfortune do not suit him; either because he seems too mediocre for anything so great, or, on the contrary, too precious to be destroyed.
    —Simone Weil (1909–1943)

    Our conjectures pass upon us for truths; we will know what we do not know, and often, what we cannot know: so mortifying to our pride is the base suspicion of ignorance.
    Philip Dormer Stanhope, 4th Earl Chesterfield (1694–1773)