Dimensions of Letters
- The Nominal Size of lettering is defined by the height (h) of the outline contour of the upper-case (capital).
- Central Line is the imaginary line in the middle of each line or line element which is a constitutive part of a graphic character set.
- If we consider d as the width of the line element and h as the height of the line element, then the two standard ratios for d/h are: 1/14 and 1/10, which are feasible because they result in a minimum number of line thicknesses.
- Location of Central Lines- The nominal size (h) and the spacing between characters (a) shall be taken as the basis for defining the central line.
- Range of Nominal Sizes -The range of nominal sizes are 2.5 mm ;3.5mm ; 5 mm; 7 mm; 10 mm; 14 mm; 20 mm;
The multiple of 1.414(square root of 2) is the range of heights for lettering is derived from the standardized progression of dimensions for paper sizes.
- Lettering Angle-The lettering may be vertical (upright) or inclined (sloped) to the right at 75° from the horizontal.
- The spacing between two characters may be reduced by half, if this gives a better visual effect.
- various letters are divided into no. of parts so that dimensions will be accurate.
- The size of letter is described by its height. According to the height of letters, they are classified as :
- Lettering A
- Lettering B
Read more about this topic: Technical Lettering
Famous quotes containing the words dimensions of, dimensions and/or letters:
“Why is it that many contemporary male thinkers, especially men of color, repudiate the imperialist legacy of Columbus but affirm dimensions of that legacy by their refusal to repudiate patriarchy?”
—bell hooks (b. c. 1955)
“Words are finite organs of the infinite mind. They cannot cover the dimensions of what is in truth. They break, chop, and impoverish it.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (18031882)
“American thinking, when it concerns itself with beautiful letters as when it concerns itself with religious dogma or political theory, is extraordinarily timid and superficial ... [I]t evades the genuinely serious problems of art and life as if they were stringently taboo ... [T]he outward virtues it undoubtedly shows are always the virtues, not of profundity, not of courage, not of originality, but merely those of an emasculated and often very trashy dilettantism.”
—H.L. (Henry Lewis)