Substitutionary Atonement - Belief in The Doctrine

Belief in The Doctrine

Many but by no means all ancient and modern branches of Christianity embrace substitutionary atonement as the central meaning of Jesus' death on the cross. These branches however have developed different theories of atonement. The Eastern Orthodox and Eastern Catholics do not incorporate substitutionary atonement in their doctrine of the Cross and Resurrection. The Roman Catholic Church incorporates it into Aquinas' Satisfaction doctrine rooted in the idea of penance. Most Evangelical Protestants interpret it largely in terms of penal substitution.

Many of the Church Fathers, including Justin Martyr, Athanasius and Augustine incorporate a theory of substitutionary atonement into their writings. However, the specific interpretation as to what this suffering for sinners meant differed to some extent. It is widely held that the early Church Fathers, including Athanasius and Augustine, taught that through Christ's vicarious suffering in humanity's place, he overcame and liberated humanity from sin, death, and the devil. Thus, while the idea of substitutionary atonement is present in nearly all atonement theories, the specific idea of satisfaction and penal substitution are later developments in the Roman Catholic church and in Calvinism.

Read more about this topic:  Substitutionary Atonement

Famous quotes containing the words belief in the, belief in, belief and/or doctrine:

    “Hope is a pathological belief in the occurrence of the impossible.”
    —H.L. (Henry Lewis)

    “We that are bound by vows and by promotion,
    With pomp of holy sacrifice and rites,
    To teach belief in good and still devotion,
    To preach of heaven’s wonders and delights—
    Yet, when each of us in his own heart looks,
    He finds the God there far unlike his books.”
    —Fulke Greville (1554–1628)

    “The belief of our Reason is an Exercise of Faith, and Faith is an Act of Reason.”
    —Joseph Glanvill (1636–1680)

    “Methodological individualism is the doctrine that psychological states are individuated with respect to their causal powers.”
    —Jerry Alan Fodor (b. 1935)