Screw Theory - Twist

In order to define the twist of a rigid body, we must consider its movement defined by the parameterized set of spatial displacements, D(t)=(,d(f)), where is a rotation matrix and d is a translation vector. This causes a point p that is fixed in moving body to trace a curve P(t) in the fixed frame given by,


\mathbf{P}(t) = \mathbf{p} + \mathbf{d}(t).

The velocity of P is


\mathbf{V}_P(t) = \left\mathbf{p} + \mathbf{v}(t),

where v is velocity of the origin of the moving frame, that is dd/dt. Now substitute p= (P-d) into this equation to obtain,


\mathbf{V}_P(t) = \mathbf{P} + \mathbf{v} - \mathbf{d}\quad\mbox{or}\quad\mathbf{V}_P(t) = \mathbf{\omega}\times\mathbf{P} + \mathbf{v} + \mathbf{d}\times\mathbf{\omega},

where = is the angular velocity matrix and ω is the angular velocity vector.

The screw

is the twist of the moving body. The vector V=v + d×ω is the velocity of the point in the body that corresponds with the origin of the fixed frame.

There are two important special cases: (i) when d is constant, that is v=0, then the twist is a pure rotation about a line, then the twist is

and (ii) when =0, that is the body does not rotate but only slides in the direction v, then the twist is a pure slide given by

Read more about this topic:  Screw Theory

Famous quotes containing the word twist:

    The greatest blunders, like the thickest ropes, are often compounded of a multitude of strands. Take the rope apart, separate it into the small threads that compose it, and you can break them one by one. You think, “That is all there was!” But twist them all together and you have something tremendous.
    Victor Hugo (1802–1885)

    The greatest blunders, like the thickest ropes, are often compounded of a multitude of strands. Take the rope apart, separate it into the small threads that compose it, and you can break them one by one. You think, “That is all there was!” But twist them all together and you have something tremendous.
    Victor Hugo (1802–1885)

    I believe in the total depravity of inanimate things ... the elusiveness of soap, the knottiness of strings, the transitory nature of buttons, the inclination of suspenders to twist and of hooks to forsake their lawful eyes, and cleave only unto the hairs of their hapless owner’s head.
    Katharine Walker (1840–1916)