Linguistic Differences Between Samogitian and Standard Lithuanian
Samogitian differs from Standard Lithuanian in phonetics, lexicon, syntax and morphology.
Phonetic differences from standard Lithuanian are varied, each Samogitian subdialect (West, North and South) has different reflections.
Standard Lithuanian → Samogitian
- i → short ė, sometimes e;
- u → short o (in some cases u);
- ė → ie;
- o → uo;
- ie → long ė, ėi, ī (y) (West, North and South);
- uo → ō, ou, ū (West, North and South);
- ai → ā ;
- ei, iai → ē;
- ui → oi;
- oi (oj) → uo;
- an → on (an in south-east);
- un → on (un in south-east);
- ą → an in south-eastern, on in the central region and ō or ou in the north;
- ę → en in south-eastern, ėn in the central region and õ, ō or ėi in the north;
- ū → ū (in some cases un, um);
- ų in stressed endings → un and um;
- unstressed ų → o;
- y → ī (y), sometimes in;
- i from ancient ī → ī;
- u from ancient ō (Lithuanian uo) → ō, ou, ū(West, North and South)
- i from ancient ei (Lithuanian ie) → long ė, ėi, ī (West, North and South)
- č → t (also č under Lithuanian influence);
- dž → d (also dž under Lithuanian influence);
- ia → ė (somewhere between i and e);
- io → ė (somewhere between i and e);
- unstressed ią → ė (somewhere between i and e);
The main difference between Samogitian and standard Lithuanian is verb conjugation. The past iterative tense is formed differently from Lithuanian (e.g., in Lithuanian the past iterative tense, meaning that action which was done in the past repeatedly, is made by removing the ending -ti and adding -davo (mirti – mirdavo, pūti – pūdavo), while in Samogitian, the word liuob is added instead before the word). The second verb conjugation is extinct in Samogitian, it merged with the first one. The plural reflexive ending is -muos instead of expected -mies which is in standard Lithuanian (-mės) and other dialects. Samogitian preserved a lot of relics of athematic conjugation which did not survive in standard Lithuanian. The intonation in the future tense third person is the same as in the infinitive, in standard Lithuanian it shifts. The subjunctive conjugation is different from standard Lithuanian. Dual is preserved perfectly while in standard Lithuanian it has been completely lost.
The differences between nominals are considerable too. The fifth noun declension has almost become extinct, it merged with the third one. The plural and some singular cases of the fourth declension have endings of the first one (e.g.: singular nominative sūnos, plural nom. sūnā, in standard Lithuanian: sg. nom. sūnus, pl. nom. sūnūs). The neuter of adjectives is extinct (it was pushed out by adverbs, except šėlt 'warm', šalt 'cold', karšt 'hot') while in standard Lithuanian it is still alive. Neuter pronouns were replaced by masculine. The second declension of adjectives is almost extinct (having merged with the first declension)—only singular nominative case endings survived. The formation of pronominals is also different from standard Lithuanian.
Read more about this topic: Samogitian Dialect
Famous quotes containing the words linguistic, differences and/or standard:
“It is merely a linguistic peculiarity, not a logical fact, that we say “that is red” instead of “that reddens,” either in the sense of growing, becoming, red, or in the sense of making something else red.”
—John Dewey (1859–1952)
“Toddlerhood resembles adolescence because of the rapidity of physical growth and because of the impulse to break loose of parental boundaries. At both ages, the struggle for independence exists hand in hand with the often hidden wish to be contained and protected while striving to move forward in the world. How parents and toddlers negotiate their differences sets the stage for their ability to remain partners during childhood and through the rebellions of the teenage years.”
—Alicia F. Lieberman (20th century)
“I don’t have any problem with a reporter or a news person who says the President is uninformed on this issue or that issue. I don’t think any of us would challenge that. I do have a problem with the singular focus on this, as if that’s the only standard by which we ought to judge a president. What we learned in the last administration was how little having an encyclopedic grasp of all the facts has to do with governing.”
—David R. Gergen (b. 1942)