Regimes of Accumulation and Modes of Regulation
Regulation theory discusses historical change of the political economy through two central concepts: Regimes of Accumulation (or Accumulation Regime)(AR) and Modes of Regulation (MR). Regimes of Accumulation analyze the way production, circulation, consumption, and distribution organizes and expands capital in a way that stabilizes the economy over a period of time. Alain Lipietz in Towards a New Economic Order describes the Regimes of Accumulation of Fordism as mass producing, proportionate share-out of value added, and a consequent stability in firm’s profitability; with the plant used at full capacity and full employment are all elements of this approach (p. 6).
MRs are institutional sets of law, norms, forms of state, policy paradigms and other practices which provide the context for the AR's operation. Typically, it is said that it comprises money form, competition form, wage form, state form, and international regime, but can encompass many more elements than these. Generally speaking, MRs support ARs by providing a conducive and supportive environment, in which the AR's are given guidelines to which they should follow. In case that there is a tension between the two, then there may occur a crisis. Thus this approach parallels Marx's characterisation of historical change as driven by 'contradictions' between the forces and the relations of production (see Historical Materialism).
Read more about this topic: Regulation School
Famous quotes containing the words accumulation, modes and/or regulation:
“You watched and you saw what happened and in the accumulation of episodes you saw the pattern: Daddy ruled the roost, called the shots, made the money, made the decisions, so you signed up on his side, and fifteen years later when the women’s movement came along with its incendiary manifestos telling you to avoid marriage and motherhood, it was as if somebody put a match to a pile of dry kindling.”
—Anne Taylor Fleming (20th century)
“The history of reform is always identical; it is the comparison of the idea with the fact. Our modes of living are not agreeable to our imagination. We suspect they are unworthy. We arraign our daily employments.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)
“Nothing changes my twenty-six years in the military. I continue to love it and everything it stands for and everything I was able to accomplish in it. To put up a wall against the military because of one regulation would be doing the same thing that the regulation does in terms of negating people.”
—Margarethe Cammermeyer (b. 1942)