Random Permutation Statistics - Expected Number of Cycles of Any Length of A Random Permutation

Expected Number of Cycles of Any Length of A Random Permutation

We construct the bivariate generating function using, where is one for all cycles (every cycle contributes one to the total number of cycles).

Note that has the closed form

and generates the unsigned Stirling numbers of the first kind.

We have

\frac{\partial}{\partial u} g(z, u) \Bigg|_{u=1} = \frac{1}{1-z} \sum_{k\ge 1} b(k) \frac{z^k}{k} = \frac{1}{1-z} \sum_{k\ge 1} \frac{z^k}{k} = \frac{1}{1-z} \log \frac{1}{1-z}.

Hence the expected number of cycles is, or about .

Read more about this topic:  Random Permutation Statistics

Famous quotes containing the words expected, number, cycles, length and/or random:

    “What strikes me as odd now is how much my father managed to get across to me without those heart-to-hearts which I’ve read about fathers and sons having in the study or in the rowboat or in the car.... Somehow I understood completely how he expected me to behave, in small matters as well as large, even though I can’t remember being given any lectures about it beyond the occasional, undramatic “You might as well be a mensch.””
    —Calvin Trillin (20th century)

    “The said truth is that it is the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong.”
    —Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832)

    “The stars which shone over Babylon and the stable in Bethlehem still shine as brightly over the Empire State Building and your front yard today. They perform their cycles with the same mathematical precision, and they will continue to affect each thing on earth, including man, as long as the earth exists.”
    —Linda Goodman (b. 1929)

    “He thought he saw an Elephant,
    That practiced on a fife:
    He looked again, and found it was
    A letter from his wife.
    “At length I realize,” he said,
    “The bitterness of Life!””
    —Lewis Carroll [Charles Lutwidge Dodgson] (1832–1898)

    “Man always made, and still makes, grotesque blunders in selecting and measuring forces, taken at random from the heap, but he never made a mistake in the value he set on the whole, which he symbolized as unity and worshipped as God. To this day, his attitude towards it has never changed, though science can no longer give to force a name.”
    —Henry Brooks Adams (1838–1918)