Origin of The Concept of Quantum Wells
In 1972, Charles H. Henry, a physicist and newly-appointed Head of the Semiconductor Electronics Research Department at Bell Laboratories, had a keen interest in the subject of integrated optics, the fabrication of optical circuits in which the light travels in waveguides.
In late 1972, while pondering the problems associated with waveguides, he had a sudden insight, a realization that a double heterostructure is a waveguide for electron waves, not just lightwaves. On further reflection, he saw that there is a complete analogy between the confinement of light by a slab waveguide and the confinement of electrons by the potential well that is formed from the difference in bandgaps in a double heterostructure.
Henry realized that there should be discrete modes (levels) in the potential well, and a simple estimate showed that if the active layer of the heterostructure is as thin as several tens of nanometres, the electron levels would be split apart by tens of milli-electron volts, which should be observable. This structure is now called a quantum well.
Henry then calculated how this quantization would alter the optical absorption edge of the semiconductor. His conclusion was that instead of the optical absorption increasing smoothly, the absorption edge of a thin heterostructure would appear as a series of steps.
In addition to Henry's contributions, the quantum well (or double-heterostructure laser, as it was originally known) was actually first proposed in 1963 by Herber Kroemer in Proceedings of the IEEE and simultaneously (in 1963) in the U.S.S.R by Zh. I. Alferov and R.F. Kazarinov. Alferov and Kroemer shared a Nobel Prize in 2000 for their work in semiconductor heterostructures.
Read more about this topic: Quantum Well Laser
Famous quotes containing the words origin of the, origin of, origin, concept, quantum and/or wells:
“The essence of morality is a questioning about morality; and the decisive move of human life is to use ceaselessly all light to look for the origin of the opposition between good and evil.”
—Georges Bataille (1897–1962)
“For, though the origin of most of our words is forgotten, each word was at first a stroke of genius, and obtained currency, because for the moment it symbolized the world to the first speaker and to the hearer. The etymologist finds the deadest word to have been once a brilliant picture.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)
“Good resolutions are useless attempts to interfere with scientific laws. Their origin is pure vanity. Their result is absolutely nil. They give us, now and then, some of those luxurious sterile emotions that have a certain charm for the weak.... They are simply cheques that men draw on a bank where they have no account.”
—Oscar Wilde (1854–1900)
“To find the length of an object, we have to perform certain
physical operations. The concept of length is therefore fixed when the operations by which length is measured are fixed: that is, the concept of length involves as much as and nothing more than the set of operations by which length is determined.”
—Percy W. Bridgman (1882–1961)
“But how is one to make a scientist understand that there is something unalterably deranged about differential calculus, quantum theory, or the obscene and so inanely liturgical ordeals of the precession of the equinoxes.”
—Antonin Artaud (1896–1948)
“Here we’ll strip and cool our fire
In cream below, in milk-baths higher;
And when all wells are drawn dry,
I’ll drink a tear out of thine eye.”
—Richard Lovelace (1618–1658)