PLANC - PLANC Basic Structure

PLANC Basic Structure

PLANC programs are structured into modules and routines.

A very simple example of a PLANC program is as follows:

MODULE mod INTEGER ARRAY : stack (0:100) PROGRAM : mprog INTEGER : i, j,k, m INISTACK stack 1 =: i 2 =: j i+j =: k =: m ENDROUTINE ENDMODULE

A difference from popular programming languages is that the assignment operator goes from left to right: First you compute the value, then you store it. Compile-time initialization of variables, on the other hand, went from right to left.

The assignment operator returns the stored value, so you could store it multiple times: 5 =: a =: b would store 5 into both the A and B variables. It shares this direction with Plankalkül, early ALGOL drafts, and Mary, another little known programming language developed in Norway, but also the popular C programming language.

A related distinct syntactic feature is that a function can be defined to take as input the computed value of the expression on its left side. Also, a single additional argument does not require surrounding parentheses. The resulting infix notation blurs the syntactical difference between functions and operators. Such expressions seem conceptually as having a computed value flowing from left to the right.

Read more about this topic:  PLANC

Famous quotes containing the words basic and/or structure:

    “Unlike femininity, relaxed masculinity is at bottom empty, a limp nullity. While the female body is full of internal potentiality, the male is internally barren.... Manhood at the most basic level can be validated and expressed only in action.”
    —George Gilder (b. 1939)

    “Why does philosophy use concepts and why does faith use symbols if both try to express the same ultimate? The answer, of course, is that the relation to the ultimate is not the same in each case. The philosophical relation is in principle a detached description of the basic structure in which the ultimate manifests itself. The relation of faith is in principle an involved expression of concern about the meaning of the ultimate for the faithful.”
    —Paul Tillich (1886–1965)