Results
Primary, February 6
| Candidate | Votes received | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Ernest Morial | 75,929 | 46.94% |
| Ron Faucheux | 73,441 | 45.35% |
| William J. Jefferson | 11,327 | 6.98% |
| Rodney Fertel | 462 | |
| Rashaad Ali | 355 | |
| Leon Waters | 347 |
While Morial was able to come out with more votes than Faucheux in the primary, four years of declining popularity meant that Morial received only about 15% of the white vote, compared with the 29% he received in the election of 1977. Morial received 90% of the black vote, while Faucheux was only able to get 1% of the black vote. Jefferson received about 7% support from both white and black voters.
Runoff, March 20
| Candidate | Votes received | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Ernest Morial | 100,703 | 53.21% |
| Ron Faucheux | 88,583 | 46.79% |
Morial was aided in the runoff by a concerted effort to bring out the black vote, using the slogan “Keep the Drive Alive.” Black voters turned out in significantly higher proportion compared to their white counterparts; many black leaders framed the election as a chance to cement the political gains won by the civil rights movement and by the subsequent election of Morial to his first term.
Faucheux’s endorsement by former mayor Moon Landrieu had little impact on the election, coming only three days before the runoff. According to the Times-Picayune’s post-election analysis, Morial won by “holding a significant white crossover vote while increasing the black turnout and denying any of it to Faucheux.”
Read more about this topic: New Orleans Mayoral Election, 1982
Famous quotes containing the word results:
“Different persons growing up in the same language are like different bushes trimmed and trained to take the shape of identical elephants. The anatomical details of twigs and branches will fulfill the elephantine form differently from bush to bush, but the overall outward results are alike.”
—Willard Van Orman Quine (b. 1908)
“It would be easy ... to regard the whole of world 3 as timeless, as Plato suggested of his world of Forms or Ideas.... I propose a different view—one which, I have found, is surprisingly fruitful. I regard world 3 as being essentially the product of the human mind.... More precisely, I regard the world 3 of problems, theories, and critical arguments as one of the results of the evolution of human language, and as acting back on this evolution.”
—Karl Popper (1902–1994)
“Pain itself can be pleasurable accidentally in so far as it is accompanied by wonder, as in stage-plays; or in so far as it recalls a beloved object to one’s memory, and makes one feel one’s love for the thing, whose absence gives us pain. Consequently, since love is pleasant, both pain and whatever else results from love, in so far as they remind us of our love, are pleasant.”
—Thomas Aquinas (c. 1225–1274)