Nakayama Lemma - Proof

Proof

A standard proof of the Nakayama lemma uses the following technique due to Atiyah & Macdonald (1969).

  • Let M be an R-module generated by n elements, and φ : M → M an R-linear map. If there is an ideal I of R such that φ(M) ⊂ IM, then there is a monic polynomial
with pk ∈ Ik, such that
as an endomorphism of M.

This assertion is precisely a generalized version of the Cayley–Hamilton theorem, and the proof proceeds along the same lines. On the generators xi of M, one has a relation of the form

where aij ∈ I. Thus

The required result follows by multiplying by the adjugate of the matrix (φδij − aij) and invoking Cramer's rule. One finds then det(φδij − aij) = 0, so the required polynomial is

To prove Nakayama's lemma from the Cayley–Hamilton theorem, assume that IM = M and take φ to be the identity on M. Then define a polynomial p(x) as above. Then

has the required property.

Read more about this topic:  Nakayama Lemma

Famous quotes containing the word proof:

    “Sculpture and painting are very justly called liberal arts; a lively and strong imagination, together with a just observation, being absolutely necessary to excel in either; which, in my opinion, is by no means the case of music, though called a liberal art, and now in Italy placed even above the other two—a proof of the decline of that country.”
    —Philip Dormer Stanhope, 4th Earl Chesterfield (1694–1773)

    “There is no better proof of a man’s being truly good than his desiring to be constantly under the observation of good men.”
    —François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (1613–1680)

    “To cease to admire is a proof of deterioration.”
    —Charles Horton Cooley (1864–1929)