The Problem
Steve Selvin wrote a letter to the American Statistician in 1975 describing a problem loosely based on the game show Let's Make a Deal (Selvin 1975a). In a subsequent letter he dubbed it the "Monty Hall problem" (Selvin 1975b). The problem is mathematically equivalent (Morgan et al., 1991) to the Three Prisoners Problem described in Martin Gardner's Mathematical Games column in Scientific American in 1959 (Gardner 1959a).
In 1990 the same problem was restated in its well-known form in a letter to Marilyn vos Savant's Ask Marilyn column in Parade:
Suppose you're on a game show, and you're given the choice of three doors: Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You pick a door, say No. 1, and the host, who knows what's behind the doors, opens another door, say No. 3, which has a goat. He then says to you, "Do you want to pick door No. 2?" Is it to your advantage to switch your choice? (Whitaker 1990)There are certain ambiguities in this formulation of the problem: it is unclear whether or not the host would always open another door, always offer a choice to switch, or even whether he would ever open the door revealing the car (Mueser and Granberg 1999). The standard understanding of the problem (resolving these ambiguities) is that the host is indeed constrained always to open an unchosen door revealing a goat and always to make the offer to switch. Very often it is also assumed that the car is initially hidden completely at random, and that if the host has a choice of door to open (which happens if the player initially picked the car) then this choice is completely random, too. (Krauss and Wang, 2003:9). Some authors, either instead of or together with these probability assumptions, assume that the player's initial choice is completely random (for instance, Selvin 1975a).
Read more about this topic: Monty Hall Problem
Famous quotes containing the word problem:
“The problem ... is emblematic of what hasnt changed during the equal opportunity revolution of the last 20 years. Doors opened; opportunities evolved. Law, institutions, corporations moved forward. But many minds did not.”
—Anna Quindlen (b. 1952)
“How much atonement is enough? The bombing must be allowed as at least part-payment: those of our young people who are concerned about the moral problem posed by the Allied air offensive should at least consider the moral problem that would have been posed if the German civilian population had not suffered at all.”
—Clive James (b. 1939)