Results
Choice | Votes | % |
---|---|---|
For | 230,711 | 55.5 |
Against | 184,954 | 44.5 |
Invalid/blank votes | 3,571 | – |
Total | 419,236 | 100 |
Registered voters/turnout | 484,718 | 86.5 |
Source: Nohlen & Stöver |
Two organisations that were conducting a quick count, Montenegrin CDT and Serbian CeSID, had different projections of the referendum results. CeSID's initial projections were giving the "yes" option significant advantage, but as the evening progressed, they changed their projection and lowered the advantage of the "yes" option. This caused serious confusion among general public and sparked journalists to challenge CeSID projections. After CeSID's announcement, thousands of people began to celebrate in the streets of every major city. However, after the CDT announcement, the public began to realize how close the result was.
CDT stated that the results were too close to call. This was later confirmed with the official results, since only about 2,000 votes were over the required threshold (the votes of some 2 or 3 polling stations). They urged the public to remain calm and give time to the referendum commission to finish their job.
Montenegrin prime minister Milo Đukanović first delayed his appearance in public, after learning how close the result was. He finally appeared on Montenegrin television at about 01:40 CEST and said that after 99.85% of the votes had been counted, the percentage of votes for independence was 55.5%, and the remaining votes (6,236) could not change the outcome of the referendum.
On the other side, de facto leader of the unionist bloc Predrag Bulatović said at a press conference around 00:15 CEST that "his sources" informed him that 54% had voted "yes", a figure below the 55% threshold. Predrag Bulatović had announced earlier that he would resign as opposition leader if the referendum was won by those favouring independence.
František Lipka, the referendum commission president or Chairman of the Electoral Commission announced on Monday the 22 May 2006 that the preliminary results were 55.4% in favor of independence. Prime Minister of the Republic of Montenegro Milo Đukanović held a press conference later that day. The press conference took place at 14:30, at the Congress Hall of the Government of the Republic of Montenegro.
Because about 19,000 votes were still disputed, the Electoral Commission delayed the announcement of final results. The opposition demanded a full recount of the votes but this was rejected by the Commission and European observers, who stated that they were satisfied and they were sure that the vote had been free and fair.
The distribution of votes was as follows: majority (around 60%-up to around 70%) were against independence in regions bordering Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. The highest No vote was in Serb-majority Plužine municipality with 75.70%. In the authentic Montenegrin regions (former Principality of Montenegro), there was a light majority (around 50-60%) for independence, with the Cetinje municipality, traditional centre of old Montenegro, having a huge percentage in favour of independence (over 86.38%). At the coastal regions, Herceg Novi municipality, which has a Serb majority had voted 61.34% against independence, the middle southern region (Tivat, Kotor, Budva and Bar) being in favour of independence, and the south, Ulcinj municipality, an ethnic Albanian centre, voted strongly in favour of independence (88.50%). The regions bordering Albania and Kosovo that have mostly Bosniak, Muslim and Albanian population, were heavily in favour of independence (78.92% in Plav, 91.33% in Rožaje). Municipalities in Montenegro that voted for the Union were Andrijevica, Berane, Kolašin, Mojkovac, Plužine, Pljevlja, Herceg-Novi, Šavnik, and Žabljak. The municipalities that voted for independence were Bar, Bijelo Polje, Budva, Cetinje, Danilovgrad, Kotor, Nikšić, Plav, Podgorica, Rožaje, Tivat, and Ulcinj. The Independentist Bloc won thanks to the high votes of Albanians and to an extent Bosniaks. The highest pro-independence percentages were in Albanian-populated Ulcinj and Bosniak-populated Rožaje.
Municipality | Yes | No | Registered Voters | Voted |
---|---|---|---|---|
Andrijevica | 1,084 (27.6%) | 2,824 (71.89%%) | 4,369 | 3,928 (89.91%) |
Bar | 16,640 (63.07%) | 9,496 (35.99%) | 32,255 | 26,382 (81.79%) |
Berane | 11,268 (46.85%) | 12,618 (52.46%) | 28,342 | 24,051 (84.86%) |
Bijelo Polje | 19,405 (55.36%) | 15,437 (44.04%) | 40,110 | 35,051 (87.39%) |
Budva | 5,908 (52.75%) | 5,180 (46.25%) | 12,797 | 11,200 (87.52%) |
Danilovgrad | 5,671 (53.15%) | 4,887 (45.81%) | 11,784 | 10,669 (90.54%) |
Žabljak | 1,188 (38.37%) | 1,884 (60.85%) | 3,407 | 3,096 (90.87%) |
Kolašin | 2,852 (41.82%) | 3,903 (57.23%) | 7,405 | 6,820 (92.1%) |
Kotor | 8,200 (55.04%) | 6,523 (43.79%) | 17,778 | 14,897 (83.79%) |
Mojkovac | 3,016 (43.55%) | 3,849 (55.57%) | 7,645 | 6,926 (90.59%) |
Nikšić | 26,387 (52.01%) | 23,837 (46.98%) | 56,461 | 50,737 (89.86%) |
Plav | 7,016 (78.47%) | 1,874 (20.96%) | 12,662 | 8,941 (70.61%) |
Plužine | 716 (24.2%) | 2,230 (75.36%) | 3,329 | 2,959 (88.88%) |
Pljevlja | 9,115 (36.07%) | 16,009 (63.36%) | 27,882 | 25,268 (90.62%) |
Podgorica | 60,626 (53.22%) | 52,345 (45.95%) | 129,083 | 113,915 (88.25%) |
Rožaje | 13,835 (90.79%) | 1,314 (8.62%) | 19,646 | 15,239 (77.57%) |
Tivat | 4,916 (55.86%) | 3,793 (43.1%) | 10,776 | 8,800 (81.66%) |
Ulcinj | 12,256 (87.64%) | 1,592 (11.38%) | 17,117 | 13,985 (81.7%) |
Herceg-Novi | 7,741 (38.28%) | 12,284 (60.75%) | 24,487 | 20,220 (88.50%) |
Cetinje | 11,536 (85.21%) | 1,818 (13.43%) | 15,077 | 13,538 (89.79%) |
Šavnik | 906 (42.67%) | 1,197 (56.38%) | 2,306 | 2,123 (92.06%) |
Prison | 379 (76.57%) | 108 (21.82%) | - | 495 |
Read more about this topic: Montenegrin Independence Referendum, 2006
Famous quotes containing the word results:
“It is perhaps the principal admirableness of the Gothic schools of architecture, that they receive the results of the labour of inferior minds; and out of fragments full of imperfection ... raise up a stately and unaccusable whole.”
—John Ruskin (18191900)
“The peace conference must not adjourn without the establishment of some ordered system of international government, backed by power enough to give authority to its decrees. ... Unless a league something like this results at our peace conference, we shall merely drop back into armed hostility and international anarchy. The war will have been fought in vain ...”
—Virginia Crocheron Gildersleeve (18771965)
“The study and knowledge of the universe would somehow be lame and defective were no practical results to follow.”
—Marcus Tullius Cicero (10643 B.C.)