Message Queue - Standards and Protocols

Standards and Protocols

Historically, Message Queuing has used proprietary, closed protocols, restricting the ability for different operating systems or programming languages to interact in a heterogenous set of environments.

An early attempt to make Message Queuing more ubiquitous was Sun Microsystem's JMS specification, which provided a Java only abstraction of a client API. This allowed java developers to switch between providers of Message Queuing in a fashion similar to that of developers using SQL databases. In practice, given the diversity of Message Queuing techniques and scenarios, this wasn't always as practical as it could be.

More recently, three standards have emerged which address making Message Queuing open and ubiquitous:

  • Advanced Message Queuing Protocol
  • MQTT
  • Streaming Text Oriented Messaging Protocol

All of these are at different stages of standardisation and adoption. All of them operate at the same level as HTTP.

Some proprietary implementations also use HTTP to provide Message Queuing by some implementations, such as Amazon's SQS. This is because it is always possible to layer asynchronous behaviour (which is what is required for Message Queuing) over a synchronous protocol using request-response semantics. However, such implementations are constrained by the underlying protocol in this case and may not be able to offer the full fidelity or set of options required in message passing above.

Read more about this topic:  Message Queue

Famous quotes containing the words standards and and/or standards:

    Our ego ideal is precious to us because it repairs a loss of our earlier childhood, the loss of our image of self as perfect and whole, the loss of a major portion of our infantile, limitless, ain’t-I-wonderful narcissism which we had to give up in the face of compelling reality. Modified and reshaped into ethical goals and moral standards and a vision of what at our finest we might be, our dream of perfection lives on—our lost narcissism lives on—in our ego ideal.
    Judith Viorst (20th century)

    In this nation I see tens of millions of its citizens, a substantial part of its whole population, who at this very moment are denied the greater part of what the very lowest standards of today call the necessities of life. I see one third of a nation ill-housed, ill-clad, ill-nourished. The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much, it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.
    Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882–1945)