Medical Hypotheses - Peer Review Debate

Peer Review Debate

Horrobin began the journal in response to what he viewed as the limitations of peer review. According to physiologist John Stein, Horrobin believed from his days as an undergraduate that peer review encourages adherence to currently accepted ideas at the expense of innovation. Also neuroscientist Vilayanur Ramachandran, who is on the journal's editorial review board, told Science: "There are ideas that may seem implausible but which are very important if true. This is the only place you can get them published."

However, Medical Hypotheses has also been criticised for its lack of peer review.

Read more about this topic:  Medical Hypotheses

Famous quotes containing the words peer, review and/or debate:

    “The Peer now spreads the glitt’ring Forfex wide,
    T’inclose the Lock; now joins it, to divide.”
    —Alexander Pope (1688–1744)

    “The thanksgiving of the old Jew, “Lord, I thank Thee that Thou didst not make me a woman,” doubtless came from a careful review of the situation. Like all of us, he had fortitude enough to bear his neighbors’ afflictions.”
    —Frances A. Griffin, U.S. suffragist. As quoted in History of Woman Suffrage, vol. 4, ch. 19, by Susan B. Anthony and Ida Husted Harper (1902)

    “Abject flattery and indiscriminate assentation degrade, as much as indiscriminate contradiction and noisy debate disgust. But a modest assertion of one’s own opinion, and a complaisant acquiescence in other people’s, preserve dignity.”
    —Philip Dormer Stanhope, 4th Earl Chesterfield (1694–1773)