Definition
Each vector field X on a smooth manifold M may be regarded as a differential operator acting on smooth functions on M. Indeed, each vector field X becomes a derivation on the smooth functions C∞(M) when we define X(f) to be the element of C∞(M) whose value at a point p is the directional derivative of f at p in the direction X(p).
The space of derivations of C∞(M) is a Lie algebra under the operation . This Lie algebra structure can be transferred to the set of vector fields on M as follows.
The Jacobi–Lie bracket or simply Lie bracket, of two vector fields X and Y is the vector field such that
Such a vector field exists because the right hand side is a derivation of C∞(M), and the vector space of such derivations is known to be isomorphic to the space of vector fields on M by the map sending a vector field X to the derivation .
To make the connection to the Lie derivative, let be the 1-parameter group of diffeomorphisms (or flow) generated by the vector field . The differential of each diffeomorphism maps the vector field Y to a new vector field . To pull-back the vector field one applies the differential of the inverse, . The Lie bracket is defined by
In particular, is the Lie derivative of the vector field with respect to . Conceptually, the Lie bracket is the derivative of in the `direction' generated by .
Though neither definition of the Lie bracket depends on a choice of coordinates, in practice one often wants to compute the bracket with respect to a coordinate system. Let be a set of local coordinate functions, and let denote the associated local frame. Then
(Here we use the Einstein summation convention)
Read more about this topic: Lie Bracket Of Vector Fields
Famous quotes containing the word definition:
“No man, not even a doctor, ever gives any other definition of what a nurse should be than this—”devoted and obedient.” This definition would do just as well for a porter. It might even do for a horse. It would not do for a policeman.”
—Florence Nightingale (1820–1910)
“Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.”
—Walter Pater (1839–1894)
“The very definition of the real becomes: that of which it is possible to give an equivalent reproduction.... The real is not only what can be reproduced, but that which is always already reproduced. The hyperreal.”
—Jean Baudrillard (b. 1929)