Relationship Between Screening and Survival
By screening, the intention is to diagnose a disease earlier than it would be without screening. Without screening, the disease may be discovered later once symptoms appear.
Even if in both cases a person will die at the same time, because the disease was diagnosed early with screening, the survival time since diagnosis is longer with screening. No additional life has been gained (and indeed, there may be added anxiety as the patient must live with knowledge of the disease for longer). For example, most people with the genetic disorder Huntington's disease are diagnosed when symptoms appear around age 50, and they die around age 65. The typical patient therefore lives about 15 years after diagnosis. With a genetic test, it is possible to diagnose this disorder at birth. If this newborn baby dies around age 65, he or she will have "survived" 65 years after diagnosis, without having actually lived any longer than the people who were diagnosed late in life.
Looking at raw statistics, screening will appear to increase survival time (this gain is called lead time). If we do not think about what survival time actually means in this context, we might attribute success to a screening test that does nothing but advance diagnosis.
Lead time bias is also an important determinant for the 5 (and 10-) Year survival.
Lead time bias can affect interpretation of the five-year survival rate.
Read more about this topic: Lead Time Bias
Famous quotes containing the words relationship between, relationship and/or survival:
“Living in cities is an art, and we need the vocabulary of art, of style, to describe the peculiar relationship between man and material that exists in the continual creative play of urban living. The city as we imagine it, then, soft city of illusion, myth, aspiration, and nightmare, is as real, maybe more real, than the hard city one can locate on maps in statistics, in monographs on urban sociology and demography and architecture.”
—Jonathan Raban (b. 1942)
“Henry David Thoreau, who never earned much of a living or sustained a relationship with any woman that wasn’t brotherly—who lived mostly under his parents’ roof ... who advocated one day’s work and six days “off” as the weekly round and was considered a bit of a fool in his hometown ... is probably the American writer who tells us best how to live comfortably with our most constant companion, ourselves.”
—Edward Hoagland (b. 1932)
“However great a man’s fear of life, suicide remains the courageous act, the clear-headed act of a mathematician. The suicide has judged by the laws of chance—so many odds against one that to live will be more miserable than to die. His sense of mathematics is greater than his sense of survival. But think how a sense of survival must clamour to be heard at the last moment, what excuses it must present of a totally unscientific nature.”
—Graham Greene (1904–1991)