Jim Ramstad - Electoral History

Electoral History

Minnesota's 3rd congressional district: Results 1990–2006
Year DFL Votes Pct Republican Votes Pct 3rd Party Party Votes Pct 3rd Party Party Votes Pct
1990 Lou Demars 96,395 33% Jim Ramstad 195,833 67% Write-ins 624 <1%
1992 Paul Mandell 104,606 33% Jim Ramstad 200,240 64% Dwight Fellman Grass Roots 9,164 3% Write-ins 721 <1%
1994 Bob Olson 62,211 26% Jim Ramstad 173,223 73% Write-ins 1,097 <1%
1996 Stan J. Leino 87,350 30% Jim Ramstad 205,816 70% *
1998 Stan J. Leino 66,505 23% Jim Ramstad 203,731 72% Derek W. Schramm Minnesota Taxpayers 12,823 5% *
2000 Sue Shuff 98,219 30% Jim Ramstad 222,571 68% Bob Odden Libertarian 5,302 2% Arne Niska Constitution 2,970 1%
2002 Darryl Stanton 82,575 28% Jim Ramstad 213,334 72% *
2004 Deborah Watts 126,665 35% Jim Ramstad 231,871 65% *
2006 Wendy Wilde 99,588 35% Jim Ramstad 184,333 65% *
*Write-in and minor candidate notes: In 1996, write-ins received 417 votes. In 1998, write-ins received 250 votes. In 2002, write-ins received 309 votes. In 2004, write-ins received 356 votes. In 2006, write-ins received 323 votes.

Read more about this topic:  Jim Ramstad

Famous quotes containing the words electoral and/or history:

    “Nothing is more unreliable than the populace, nothing more obscure than human intentions, nothing more deceptive than the whole electoral system.”
    —Marcus Tullius Cicero (106–43 B.C.)

    “Postmodernism is, almost by definition, a transitional cusp of social, cultural, economic and ideological history when modernism’s high-minded principles and preoccupations have ceased to function, but before they have been replaced with a totally new system of values. It represents a moment of suspension before the batteries are recharged for the new millennium, an acknowledgment that preceding the future is a strange and hybrid interregnum that might be called the last gasp of the past.”
    —Gilbert Adair, British author, critic. Sunday Times: Books (London, April 21, 1991)