Detailed Solution
Mathematician P
P knows p=52. P suspects (2,26) and (4,13). P knows s=28 or s=17.
If s=28:
- S would suspect (2,26), (3,25), (4,24), (5,23), (6,22), (7,21), (8,20), (9,19), (10,18), (11,17), (12,16), and (13,15).
- S would know if (5,23) or (11,17), P would know the numbers.
- S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
If s=17:
- S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
- S would know that P would not know the numbers.
- S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (2,26) and learns (4,13) is the answer.
Mathematician S
S knows s=17. S suspects (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9). S knows p is 30, 42, 52, 60, 66, 70, or 72.
When P says "Then, I found these numbers," S knows his statement eliminated all but one possibility for P.
S simulates P's thinking
Case 1 (p=30)P knows p=30. P suspects (2,15), (3,10), and (5,6). P knows s is 17, 13, or 11.
If s=17:
- S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
- S would know that P would not know the numbers.
- S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
If s=13:
- S would suspect (2,11), (3,10), (4,9), (5,8), and (6,7).
- S would know if (2,11), P would know the numbers.
- S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
If s=11:
- S would suspect (2,9), (3,8), (4,7), and (5,6).
- S would know that P would not know the numbers.
- S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (3,10) but cannot decide between (2,15) and (5,6).
Case 2 (p=42)P knows p=42. P suspects (2,21), (3,14), and (6,7). P knows s is 23, 17, or 13.
If s=23:
- S would suspect (2,21), (3,20), (4,19), (5,18), (6,17), (7,16), (8,15), (9,14), (10,13), and (11,12).
- S would know that P would not know the numbers.
- S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
If s=17:
- S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
- S would know that P would not know the numbers.
- S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
If s=13:
- S would suspect (2,11), (3,10), (4,9), (5,8), and (6,7).
- S would know if (2,11), P would know the numbers.
- S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (6,7) but cannot decide between (2,21) and (3,14).
Case 3 (p=52)See Mathematician P's actual reasoning above.
Case 4 (p=60)P knows p=60. P suspects (2,30), (3,20), (4,15), (5,12), and (6,10). P knows s is 32, 23, 19, 17, or 16.
If s=32:
- S would suspect (2,30), (3,29), (4,28), (5,27), (6,26), (7,25), (8,24), (9,23), (10,22), (11,21), (12,20), (13,19), (14,18), and (15,17).
- S would know if (3,29) or (13,19), P would know the numbers.
- S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
If s=23:
- S would suspect (2,21), (3,20), (4,19), (5,18), (6,17), (7,16), (8,15), (9,14), (10,13), and (11,12).
- S would know that P would not know the numbers.
- S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
If s=19:
- S would suspect (2,17), (3,16), (4,15), (5,14), (6,13), (7,12), (8,11), and (9,10).
- S would know if (2,17), P would know the numbers.
- S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
If s=17:
- S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
- S would know that P would not know the numbers.
- S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
If s=16:
- S would suspect (2,14), (3,13), (4,12), (5,11), (6,10), and (7,9).
- S would know if (3,13) or (5,11), P would know the numbers.
- S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (2,30), (4,15), and (6,10) but cannot decide between (3,20) and (5,12).
Case 5 (p=66)P knows p=66. P suspects (2,33), (3,22), and (6,11). P knows s is 35, 25, or 17.
If s=35:
- S would suspect (2,33), (3,32), (4,31), (5,30), (6,29), (7,28), (8,27), (9,26), (10,25), (11,24), (12,23), (13,22), (14,21), (15,20), (16,19), and (17,18).
- S would know that P would not know the numbers.
- S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
If s=25:
- S would suspect (2,23), (3,22), (4,21), (5,20), (6,19), (7,18), (8,17), (9,16), (10,15), (11,14), and (12,13).
- S would know if (2,23), P would know the numbers.
- S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
If s=17:
- S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
- S would know that P would not know the numbers.
- S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (3,22) but cannot decide between (2,33) and (6,11).
Case 6 (p=70)P knows p=70. P suspects (2,35), (5,14), and (7,10). P knows s is 37, 19, or 17.
If s=37:
- S would suspect (2,35), (3,34), (4,33), (5,32), (6,31), (7,30), (8,29), (9,28), (10,27), (11,26), (12,25), (13,24), (14,23), (15,22), (16,21), (17,20), and (18,19).
- S would know that P would not know the numbers.
- S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
If s=19:
- S would suspect (2,17), (3,16), (4,15), (5,14), (6,13), (7,12), (8,11), and (9,10).
- S would know if (2,17), P would know the numbers.
- S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
If s=17:
- S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
- S would know that P would not know the numbers.
- S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (5,14) but cannot decide between (2,35) and (7,10).
Case 7 (p=72)P knows p=72. P suspects (2,36), (3,24), (4,18), (6,12), and (8,9). P knows s is 38, 27, 22, 18, or 17.
If s=38:
- S would suspect (2,36), (3,35), (4,34), (5,33), (6,32), (7,31), (8,30), (9,29), (10,28), (11,27), (12,26), (13,25), (14,24), (15,23), (16,22), (17,21), and (18,20).
- S would know that if (7,31), P would know the numbers.
- S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
If s=27:
- S would suspect (2,25), (3,24), (4,23), (5,22), (6,21), (7,20), (8,19), (9,18), (10,17), (11,16), (12,15), and (13,14).
- S would know that P would not know the numbers.
- S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
If s=22:
- S would suspect (2,20), (3,19), (4,18), (5,17), (6,16), (7,15), (8,14), (9,13), and (10,12).
- S would know if (3,19) or (5,17), P would know the numbers.
- S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
If s=18:
- S would suspect (2,16), (3,15), (4,14), (5,13), (6,12), (7,11), and (8,10).
- S would know if (5,13) or (7,11), P would know the numbers.
- S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
If s=17:
- S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
- S would know that P would not know the numbers.
- S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."
Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (2,36), (4,18), and (6,12) but cannot decide between (3,24) and (8,9).
Only Case 3 eliminates all but one possibility for P. That's how S decides (4,13) is the answer.
Read more about this topic: Impossible Puzzle
Famous quotes containing the words detailed and/or solution:
“[The Republicans] offer ... a detailed agenda for national renewal.... [On] reducing illegitimacy ... the state will use ... funds for programs to reduce out-of-wedlock pregnancies, to promote adoption, to establish and operate childrens group homes, to establish and operate residential group homes for unwed mothers, or for any purpose the state deems appropriate. None of the taxpayer funds may be used for abortion services or abortion counseling.”
—Newt Gingrich (b. 1943)
“The Settlement ... is an experimental effort to aid in the solution of the social and industrial problems which are engendered by the modern conditions of life in a great city. It insists that these problems are not confined to any one portion of the city. It is an attempt to relieve, at the same time, the overaccumulation at one end of society and the destitution at the other ...”
—Jane Addams (18601935)