Impossible Puzzle - Detailed Solution

Detailed Solution

Mathematician P

P knows p=52. P suspects (2,26) and (4,13). P knows s=28 or s=17.

If s=28:

S would suspect (2,26), (3,25), (4,24), (5,23), (6,22), (7,21), (8,20), (9,19), (10,18), (11,17), (12,16), and (13,15).
S would know if (5,23) or (11,17), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=17:

S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (2,26) and learns (4,13) is the answer.

Mathematician S

S knows s=17. S suspects (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9). S knows p is 30, 42, 52, 60, 66, 70, or 72.

When P says "Then, I found these numbers," S knows his statement eliminated all but one possibility for P.

S simulates P's thinking

Case 1 (p=30)

P knows p=30. P suspects (2,15), (3,10), and (5,6). P knows s is 17, 13, or 11.

If s=17:

S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=13:

S would suspect (2,11), (3,10), (4,9), (5,8), and (6,7).
S would know if (2,11), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=11:

S would suspect (2,9), (3,8), (4,7), and (5,6).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (3,10) but cannot decide between (2,15) and (5,6).

Case 2 (p=42)

P knows p=42. P suspects (2,21), (3,14), and (6,7). P knows s is 23, 17, or 13.

If s=23:

S would suspect (2,21), (3,20), (4,19), (5,18), (6,17), (7,16), (8,15), (9,14), (10,13), and (11,12).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=17:

S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=13:

S would suspect (2,11), (3,10), (4,9), (5,8), and (6,7).
S would know if (2,11), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (6,7) but cannot decide between (2,21) and (3,14).

Case 3 (p=52)

See Mathematician P's actual reasoning above.

Case 4 (p=60)

P knows p=60. P suspects (2,30), (3,20), (4,15), (5,12), and (6,10). P knows s is 32, 23, 19, 17, or 16.

If s=32:

S would suspect (2,30), (3,29), (4,28), (5,27), (6,26), (7,25), (8,24), (9,23), (10,22), (11,21), (12,20), (13,19), (14,18), and (15,17).
S would know if (3,29) or (13,19), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=23:

S would suspect (2,21), (3,20), (4,19), (5,18), (6,17), (7,16), (8,15), (9,14), (10,13), and (11,12).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=19:

S would suspect (2,17), (3,16), (4,15), (5,14), (6,13), (7,12), (8,11), and (9,10).
S would know if (2,17), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=17:

S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=16:

S would suspect (2,14), (3,13), (4,12), (5,11), (6,10), and (7,9).
S would know if (3,13) or (5,11), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (2,30), (4,15), and (6,10) but cannot decide between (3,20) and (5,12).

Case 5 (p=66)

P knows p=66. P suspects (2,33), (3,22), and (6,11). P knows s is 35, 25, or 17.

If s=35:

S would suspect (2,33), (3,32), (4,31), (5,30), (6,29), (7,28), (8,27), (9,26), (10,25), (11,24), (12,23), (13,22), (14,21), (15,20), (16,19), and (17,18).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=25:

S would suspect (2,23), (3,22), (4,21), (5,20), (6,19), (7,18), (8,17), (9,16), (10,15), (11,14), and (12,13).
S would know if (2,23), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=17:

S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (3,22) but cannot decide between (2,33) and (6,11).

Case 6 (p=70)

P knows p=70. P suspects (2,35), (5,14), and (7,10). P knows s is 37, 19, or 17.

If s=37:

S would suspect (2,35), (3,34), (4,33), (5,32), (6,31), (7,30), (8,29), (9,28), (10,27), (11,26), (12,25), (13,24), (14,23), (15,22), (16,21), (17,20), and (18,19).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=19:

S would suspect (2,17), (3,16), (4,15), (5,14), (6,13), (7,12), (8,11), and (9,10).
S would know if (2,17), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=17:

S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (5,14) but cannot decide between (2,35) and (7,10).

Case 7 (p=72)

P knows p=72. P suspects (2,36), (3,24), (4,18), (6,12), and (8,9). P knows s is 38, 27, 22, 18, or 17.

If s=38:

S would suspect (2,36), (3,35), (4,34), (5,33), (6,32), (7,31), (8,30), (9,29), (10,28), (11,27), (12,26), (13,25), (14,24), (15,23), (16,22), (17,21), and (18,20).
S would know that if (7,31), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=27:

S would suspect (2,25), (3,24), (4,23), (5,22), (6,21), (7,20), (8,19), (9,18), (10,17), (11,16), (12,15), and (13,14).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=22:

S would suspect (2,20), (3,19), (4,18), (5,17), (6,16), (7,15), (8,14), (9,13), and (10,12).
S would know if (3,19) or (5,17), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=18:

S would suspect (2,16), (3,15), (4,14), (5,13), (6,12), (7,11), and (8,10).
S would know if (5,13) or (7,11), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=17:

S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (2,36), (4,18), and (6,12) but cannot decide between (3,24) and (8,9).

Only Case 3 eliminates all but one possibility for P. That's how S decides (4,13) is the answer.

Read more about this topic:  Impossible Puzzle

Famous quotes containing the words detailed and/or solution:

    [The Republicans] offer ... a detailed agenda for national renewal.... [On] reducing illegitimacy ... the state will use ... funds for programs to reduce out-of-wedlock pregnancies, to promote adoption, to establish and operate children’s group homes, to establish and operate residential group homes for unwed mothers, or for any purpose the state deems appropriate. None of the taxpayer funds may be used for abortion services or abortion counseling.
    Newt Gingrich (b. 1943)

    There is a lot of talk now about metal detectors and gun control. Both are good things. But they are no more a solution than forks and spoons are a solution to world hunger.
    Anna Quindlen (b. 1953)