Impossible Puzzle - Detailed Solution

Detailed Solution

Mathematician P

P knows p=52. P suspects (2,26) and (4,13). P knows s=28 or s=17.

If s=28:

S would suspect (2,26), (3,25), (4,24), (5,23), (6,22), (7,21), (8,20), (9,19), (10,18), (11,17), (12,16), and (13,15).
S would know if (5,23) or (11,17), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=17:

S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (2,26) and learns (4,13) is the answer.

Mathematician S

S knows s=17. S suspects (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9). S knows p is 30, 42, 52, 60, 66, 70, or 72.

When P says "Then, I found these numbers," S knows his statement eliminated all but one possibility for P.

S simulates P's thinking

Case 1 (p=30)

P knows p=30. P suspects (2,15), (3,10), and (5,6). P knows s is 17, 13, or 11.

If s=17:

S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=13:

S would suspect (2,11), (3,10), (4,9), (5,8), and (6,7).
S would know if (2,11), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=11:

S would suspect (2,9), (3,8), (4,7), and (5,6).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (3,10) but cannot decide between (2,15) and (5,6).

Case 2 (p=42)

P knows p=42. P suspects (2,21), (3,14), and (6,7). P knows s is 23, 17, or 13.

If s=23:

S would suspect (2,21), (3,20), (4,19), (5,18), (6,17), (7,16), (8,15), (9,14), (10,13), and (11,12).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=17:

S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=13:

S would suspect (2,11), (3,10), (4,9), (5,8), and (6,7).
S would know if (2,11), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (6,7) but cannot decide between (2,21) and (3,14).

Case 3 (p=52)

See Mathematician P's actual reasoning above.

Case 4 (p=60)

P knows p=60. P suspects (2,30), (3,20), (4,15), (5,12), and (6,10). P knows s is 32, 23, 19, 17, or 16.

If s=32:

S would suspect (2,30), (3,29), (4,28), (5,27), (6,26), (7,25), (8,24), (9,23), (10,22), (11,21), (12,20), (13,19), (14,18), and (15,17).
S would know if (3,29) or (13,19), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=23:

S would suspect (2,21), (3,20), (4,19), (5,18), (6,17), (7,16), (8,15), (9,14), (10,13), and (11,12).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=19:

S would suspect (2,17), (3,16), (4,15), (5,14), (6,13), (7,12), (8,11), and (9,10).
S would know if (2,17), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=17:

S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=16:

S would suspect (2,14), (3,13), (4,12), (5,11), (6,10), and (7,9).
S would know if (3,13) or (5,11), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (2,30), (4,15), and (6,10) but cannot decide between (3,20) and (5,12).

Case 5 (p=66)

P knows p=66. P suspects (2,33), (3,22), and (6,11). P knows s is 35, 25, or 17.

If s=35:

S would suspect (2,33), (3,32), (4,31), (5,30), (6,29), (7,28), (8,27), (9,26), (10,25), (11,24), (12,23), (13,22), (14,21), (15,20), (16,19), and (17,18).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=25:

S would suspect (2,23), (3,22), (4,21), (5,20), (6,19), (7,18), (8,17), (9,16), (10,15), (11,14), and (12,13).
S would know if (2,23), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=17:

S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (3,22) but cannot decide between (2,33) and (6,11).

Case 6 (p=70)

P knows p=70. P suspects (2,35), (5,14), and (7,10). P knows s is 37, 19, or 17.

If s=37:

S would suspect (2,35), (3,34), (4,33), (5,32), (6,31), (7,30), (8,29), (9,28), (10,27), (11,26), (12,25), (13,24), (14,23), (15,22), (16,21), (17,20), and (18,19).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=19:

S would suspect (2,17), (3,16), (4,15), (5,14), (6,13), (7,12), (8,11), and (9,10).
S would know if (2,17), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=17:

S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (5,14) but cannot decide between (2,35) and (7,10).

Case 7 (p=72)

P knows p=72. P suspects (2,36), (3,24), (4,18), (6,12), and (8,9). P knows s is 38, 27, 22, 18, or 17.

If s=38:

S would suspect (2,36), (3,35), (4,34), (5,33), (6,32), (7,31), (8,30), (9,29), (10,28), (11,27), (12,26), (13,25), (14,24), (15,23), (16,22), (17,21), and (18,20).
S would know that if (7,31), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=27:

S would suspect (2,25), (3,24), (4,23), (5,22), (6,21), (7,20), (8,19), (9,18), (10,17), (11,16), (12,15), and (13,14).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=22:

S would suspect (2,20), (3,19), (4,18), (5,17), (6,16), (7,15), (8,14), (9,13), and (10,12).
S would know if (3,19) or (5,17), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=18:

S would suspect (2,16), (3,15), (4,14), (5,13), (6,12), (7,11), and (8,10).
S would know if (5,13) or (7,11), P would know the numbers.
S would not be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

If s=17:

S would suspect (2,15), (3,14), (4,13), (5,12), (6,11), (7,10), and (8,9).
S would know that P would not know the numbers.
S would be able to say "I was sure that you could not find them."

Therefore, when S says "I was sure that you could not find them," P eliminates (2,36), (4,18), and (6,12) but cannot decide between (3,24) and (8,9).

Only Case 3 eliminates all but one possibility for P. That's how S decides (4,13) is the answer.

Read more about this topic:  Impossible Puzzle

Famous quotes containing the words detailed and/or solution:

    ... every event has had its cause, and nothing, not the least wind that blows, is accident or causeless. To understand what happens now one must find the cause, which may be very long ago in its beginning, but is surely there, and therefore a knowledge of history as detailed as possible is essential if we are to comprehend the past and be prepared for the future.
    Pearl S. Buck (1892–1973)

    Give a scientist a problem and he will probably provide a solution; historians and sociologists, by contrast, can offer only opinions. Ask a dozen chemists the composition of an organic compound such as methane, and within a short time all twelve will have come up with the same solution of CH4. Ask, however, a dozen economists or sociologists to provide policies to reduce unemployment or the level of crime and twelve widely differing opinions are likely to be offered.
    Derek Gjertsen, British scientist, author. Science and Philosophy: Past and Present, ch. 3, Penguin (1989)