Recognizing Fibonacci Numbers
The question may arise whether a positive integer z is a Fibonacci number. Since is the closest integer to, the most straightforward, brute-force test is the identity
which is true if and only if z is a Fibonacci number. In this formula, can be computed rapidly using any of the previously discussed closed-form expressions.
One implication of the above expression is this: if it is known that a number z is a Fibonacci number, we may determine an n such that F(n) = z by the following:
Alternatively, a positive integer z is a Fibonacci number if and only if one of or is a perfect square.
A slightly more sophisticated test uses the fact that the convergents of the continued fraction representation of are ratios of successive Fibonacci numbers. That is, the inequality
(with coprime positive integers p, q) is true if and only if p and q are successive Fibonacci numbers. From this one derives the criterion that z is a Fibonacci number if and only if the closed interval
contains a positive integer. For, it is easy to show that this interval contains at most one integer, and in the event that z is a Fibonacci number, the contained integer is equal to the next successive Fibonacci number after z. Somewhat remarkably, this result still holds for the case, but it must be stated carefully since appears twice in the Fibonacci sequence, and thus has two distinct successors.
Read more about this topic: Fibonacci Numbers
Famous quotes containing the words recognizing and/or numbers:
“It is possible to make friends with our children—but probably not while they are children.... Friendship is a relationship of mutual dependence-interdependence. A family is a relationship in which some of the participants are dependent on others. It is the job of parents to provide for their children. It is not appropriate for adults to enter into parenthood recognizing they have made a decision to accept dependents and then try to pretend that their children are not dependent on them.”
—Donald C. Medeiros (20th century)
“Publishers are notoriously slothful about numbers, unless they’re attached to dollar signs—unlike journalists, quarterbacks, and felony criminal defendents who tend to be keenly aware of numbers at all times.”
—Hunter S. Thompson (b. 1939)