Norm-Euclidean Fields
Algebraic number fields K come with a canonical norm function on them: the absolute value of the field norm N that takes an algebraic element α to the product of all the conjugates of α. This norm maps the ring of integers of a number field K, say OK, to the nonnegative rational integers, so it is a candidate to be a Euclidean norm on this ring. If this norm satisfies the axioms of a Euclidean function then the number field K is called norm-Euclidean. Strictly speaking it is the ring of integers that is Euclidean since fields are trivially Euclidean domains, but the terminology is standard.
If a field is not norm-Euclidean then that does not mean the ring of integers is not Euclidean, just that the field norm does not satisfy the axioms of a Euclidean function. Indeed, there are examples of number fields whose ring of integers is Euclidean but not norm-Euclidean, a simple example being the quadratic field . However, for imaginary quadratic fields it is indeed the case that the Eucidean fields are norm-Euclidean. Finding all such fields is a major open problem, particularly in the quadratic case.
The norm-Euclidean quadratic fields have been fully classified, they are where d takes the values
- −11, −7, −3, −2, −1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 21, 29, 33, 37, 41, 57, 73 (sequence A048981 in OEIS).
Read more about this topic: Euclidean Domain
Famous quotes containing the word fields:
“Nature will not let us fret and fume. She does not like our benevolence or our learning much better than she likes our frauds and wars. When we come out of the caucus, or the bank, or the abolition-convention, or the temperance-meeting, or the transcendental club, into the fields and woods, she says to us, so hot? my little Sir.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (18031882)