Number of Electrons in Each Shell
| Shell name |
Subshell name |
Subshell max electrons |
Shell max electrons |
|---|---|---|---|
| K | 1s | 2 | 2 |
| L | 2s | 2 | 2 + 6 = 8 |
| 2p | 6 | ||
| M | 3s | 2 | 2 + 6 + 10 = 18 |
| 3p | 6 | ||
| 3d | 10 | ||
| N | 4s | 2 | 2 + 6 + + 10 + 14 = 32 |
| 4p | 6 | ||
| 4d | 10 | ||
| 4f | 14 |
An atom's electron shells are filled according to the following theoretical constraints:
- Each s subshell holds at most 2 electrons
- Each p subshell holds at most 6 electrons
- Each d subshell holds at most 10 electrons
- Each f subshell holds at most 14 electrons
- Each g subshell holds at most 18 electrons
Therefore, the K shell, which contains only an s subshell, can hold up to 2 electrons; the L shell, which contains an s and a p, can hold up to 2 + 6 = 8 electrons; and so forth. The general formula is that the nth shell can in principle hold up to 2n2 electrons.
Although that formula gives the maximum in principle, in fact that maximum is only achieved (by known elements) for the first four shells (K,L,M,N). No known element has more than 32 electrons in any one shell. This is because the subshells are filled according to the Aufbau principle. The first elements to have more than 32 electrons in one shell would belong to the g-block of period 8 of the periodic table. These elements would have some electrons in their 5g subshell and thus have more than 32 electrons in the O shell (fifth principal shell).
Read more about this topic: Electron Shell
Famous quotes containing the words number of, number, electrons and/or shell:
“To make life more bearable and pleasant for everybody, choose the issues that are significant enough to fight over, and ignore or use distraction for those you can let slide that day. Picking your battles will eliminate a number of conflicts, and yet will still leave you feeling in control.”
—Lawrence Balter (20th century)
“I will not adopt that ungenerous and impolitic custom so common with novel writers, of degrading by their contemptuous censure the very performances, to the number of which they are themselves adding—joining with their greatest enemies in bestowing the harshest epithets on such works, and scarcely ever permitting them to be read by their own heroine, who, if she accidentally take up a novel, is sure to turn over its insipid leaves with disgust.”
—Jane Austen (1775–1817)
“Such is the art of writing as Dreiser understands it and practices it—an endless piling up of minutiae, an almost ferocious tracking down of ions, electrons and molecules, an unshakable determination to tell it all. One is amazed by the mole-like diligence of the man, and no less by his exasperating disregard for the ease of his readers.”
—H.L. (Henry Lewis)
“I do not know what I may appear to the world; but to myself I seem to have been only like a boy playing on the seashore, and diverting myself in now and then finding a smoother pebble or a prettier shell than ordinary, whilst the great ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me.”
—Isaac Newton (1642–1727)