Edwards V. Canada (Attorney General) - The Reference To The Supreme Court

The Reference To The Supreme Court

In Canada, the federal government has the power to refer questions to the Supreme Court of Canada to clarify legal and constitutional issues. Ernest Lapointe, who was Minister of Justice in the government of William Lyon Mackenzie King, reviewed the petition and recommended to the federal Cabinet that the questions be narrowed down from two to one, relating to the appointment of women to the federal Senate of Canada under section 24 of the British North America Act, 1867 (now known as the Constitution Act, 1867).

On October 19, 1927, the Cabinet submitted this question for clarification to the Supreme Court of Canada:

"Does the word 'Persons' in section 24 of the British North America Act, 1867, include female persons?"

Emily Murphy, speaking for the five petitioners, originally objected to this change in the wording of the question, which she described in a letter to the Deputy Minister of Justice as "...a matter of amazement and perturbation to us." On behalf of the petitioners, she asked that the Government withdraw the single question and refer the original two questions to the Supreme Court, along with a new, third question:

"3. If any statute be necessary to qualify a female to sit in the Senate of Canada, must this statute be enacted by the Imperial Parliament, or does power lie with the Parliament of Canada, or the Senate of Canada?"

However, after further correspondence with the Deputy Minister and consultation with their lawyer, Emily Murphy advised the Deputy Minister that they accepted the single question posed by the Cabinet.

Read more about this topic:  Edwards V. Canada (Attorney General)

Famous quotes containing the words supreme court, reference, supreme and/or court:

    Henderson: What about Congress and the Supreme Court and the President? We got to pay them, don’t we?
    Grandpa: Not with my money, no sir.
    Robert Riskin (1897–1955)

    A sign, or representamen, is something which stands to somebody for something in some respect or capacity. It addresses somebody, that is, creates in the mind of that person an equivalent sign, or perhaps a more developed sign. That sign which it creates I call the interpretant of the first sign. The sign stands for something, its object. It stands for that object, not in all respects, but in reference to a sort of idea, which I have sometimes called the ground of the representamen.
    Charles Sanders Peirce (1839–1914)

    The Constitution and the laws are supreme and the Union indissoluble.
    Andrew Jackson (1767–1845)

    You don’t need to know who’s playing on the White House tennis court to be a good president. A president has many roles.
    James Baker (b. 1930)