ECTS Grading Scale - Practical Example

Practical Example

The following table exemplifies the application of the statistical distribution analysis to convert a grading system to the ECTS scale. It refers to the Faculty of Law of the University of Regensburg. The original table can be found on the Akademisches Auslandsamt - Uni Regensburg ECTS Grading page. Compared to the above table though, the result seems unnecessarily harsh (only the best 4.18% of passing students get an A compared to 10% above and to get a B one would still have to be within the best 20%, not the best 35% as above, and so on).

Law Grade Definition
(according to exam regulations for German law students)
Percentage of students achieving the grade in the First State Exam ECTS Grade
18 – 16 = sehr gut A particularly outstanding achievement 0,30% A
15 – 13 = gut An achievement that lies significantly above the average standard 2,65%
12 – 10 = vollbefriedigend An achievement that surpasses the average standard 10,94% B
9 – 7 = befriedigend An achievement that fulfills the average standard 26,90% C
6 – 5 = ausreichend An achievement that fulfills the average standard despite deficiencies 29,81% D
4 = ausreichend E
3 – 1 = mangelhaft An achievement that suffers considerably from deficiencies, as a whole no longer useful 29,38% FX
0 = ungenügend Indescribably bad performance, total absence or failure to take any exams or do any work. F

Read more about this topic:  ECTS Grading Scale

Famous quotes containing the word practical:

    Juggling produces both practical and psychological benefits.... A woman’s involvement in one role can enhance her functioning in another. Being a wife can make it easier to work outside the home. Being a mother can facilitate the activities and foster the skills of the efficient wife or of the effective worker. And employment outside the home can contribute in substantial, practical ways to how one works within the home, as a spouse and as a parent.
    Faye J. Crosby (20th century)

    General scepticism is the live mental attitude of refusing to conclude. It is a permanent torpor of the will, renewing itself in detail towards each successive thesis that offers, and you can no more kill it off by logic than you can kill off obstinacy or practical joking.
    William James (1842–1910)