Ambiguous Names
The names of the 640 districts are mostly unique. There are some exceptions:
- Within India five names are ambiguous, representing 10 districts: (Aurangabad district, Bihar, Aurangabad district, Maharashtra; Bijapur district, Chhattisgarh, Bijapur district, Karnataka; Bilaspur district, Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur district, Himachal Pradesh; Hamirpur district, Himachal Pradesh, Hamirpur district, Uttar Pradesh; Pratapgarh district, Rajasthan, Pratapgarh district, Uttar Pradesh).
- Seven districts share names with districts in other countries in South Asia: Bhojpur district, Bihar versus Bhojpur District, Nepal; Daman district, India vs. Daman District, Afghanistan, Ghaziabad District, Uttar Pradesh vs. Ghaziabad District, Afghanistan; Gopalganj district, Bihar vs. Gopalganj District (Bangladesh); Hyderabad district, Andhra Pradesh vs Hyderabad District, Pakistan; Lalitpur district, Uttar Pradesh vs Lalitpur District, Nepal; Poonch district, Jammu and Kashmir, vs. Poonch district, Pakistan
- One outside South Asia: Mansa district, Punjab, Mansa District, Zambia
The following tables list the population details of various states. The columns include the hierarchical administrative subdivision codes, the district name, district headquarters, 2001 census population, area in square kilometres, and the population density per square kilometre. Some districts that are entirely urban (such as Mumbai City) or very small, such as Yanam in Pondicherry do not have a separate location as district headquarters, and hence are omitted in this table.
Read more about this topic: Districts Of India
Famous quotes containing the words ambiguous and/or names:
“The whole of natural theology ... resolves itself into one simple, though somewhat ambiguous proposition, That the cause or causes of order in the universe probably bear some remote analogy to human intelligence.”
—David Hume (1711–1776)
“Being the dependents of the general government, and looking to its treasury as the source of all their emoluments, the state officers, under whatever names they might pass and by whatever forms their duties might be prescribed, would in effect be the mere stipendiaries and instruments of the central power.”
—Andrew Jackson (1767–1845)