Critical Approaches To Hamlet - Further Reading

Further Reading

  • Blits, Jan H. 2001. Introduction. In Deadly Thought: "Hamlet" and the Human Soul. Langham, Maryland: Lexington Books. ISBN 0-7391-0214-1.
  • Bloom, Harold. 2003. Hamlet: Poem Unlimited. Edinburgh: Cannongate. ISBN 1-84195-461-6.
  • Cantor, Paul. 1989. Hamlet. UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-84003-1.
  • Chambers, Edmund Kerchever. 1923. The Elizabethan Stage. 4 volumes, Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-811511-3.
  • ———. 1930. William Shakespeare: A Study of Facts and Problems. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988. ISBN 0-19-811774-4.
  • Eliot, T.S. "Hamlet and His Problems." The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism.
  • Downes, John. 1708. Roscius Anglicanus. Reprinted edition. New York: Benjamin Bloom, 1968. ISBN 0-405-08464-1.
  • Foakes, R. A. 1993. Hamlet versus Lear: Cultural Politics and Shakespeare's Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-60705-1.
  • Freeman, John. "This Side of Purgatory: Ghostly Fathers and the Recusant Legacy in Hamlet." Shakespeare and the Culture of Christianity in Early Modern England. Ed. Dennis Taylor and David Beauregard. New York: Fordham University Press, 2003. ISBN 0-8232-2284-5.
  • Furness, Horace Howard, ed. 1905. A New Variorum Edition of Hamlet. New York: Lippincott.
  • French, George Russell. 1869. Shakspeareana Geologica. London: Macmillan. Reprinted New York: AMS, 1975. ISBN 0-404-02575-7.
  • Freud, Sigmund. 1900. The Interpretation of Dreams. Trans. James Strachey. Ed. Angela Richards. The Penguin Freud Library, vol. 4. London: Penguin, 1991. ISBN 0-14-013794-7.
  • Greenblatt, Stephen. Hamlet in Purgatory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001. ISBN 0-691-05873-3.
  • Halliday, F. E. 1964. A Shakespeare Companion 1564–1964. Shakespeare Library ser. Baltimore, Penguin, 1969. ISBN 0-14-053011-8.
  • Howard, Jean E. 2003. "Feminist Criticism". In Shakespeare: An Oxford Guide. Ed. Stanley Wells and Lena Orlin. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-924522-3. 411–423.
  • Hurstfield, Joel and James Sutherland. 1964. Shakespeare's World. New York: St. Martin's Press.
  • Jenkins, Harold. 1965. "Hamlet Then and Now". Shakespeare Survey 18:$-$.
  • Kirsch, A. C. 1968. "A Caroline Commentary on the Drama". Modern Philology 66: 256-61.
  • Knowles, Ronald. 1999. "Hamlet and Counter-Humanism." Renaissance Quarterly 52.4: 1046–69.
  • MacCary, W Thomas. 1998. "Hamlet": A Guide to the Play. Greenwood Guides to Shakespeare ser. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 0-313-30082-8.
  • Mack, Maynard. 1993. Everybody's Shakespeare. University of Nebraska Press: Lincoln, NB. ISBN 0-8032-8214-1.
  • Marcus, Leah S. 1988. Puzzling Shakespeare: Local Readings and Its Discontents. The New Historicism: Studies in Cultural Poetics ser. Reprinted ed. Berkley: University of California Press, 1992. ISBN 0-520-07191-3.
  • Matheson, Mark. 1995. "Hamlet and 'A Matter Tender and Dangerous'". Shakespeare Quarterly 46.4: 383-97.
  • Matus, Irvin Leigh. 1994. Shakespeare, in Fact. New ed. New York: Continuum International Publishing, 1999. ISBN 0-8264-0928-8.
  • Ogburn, Charlton. 1988. The Mystery of William Shakespeare. London : Cardinal. ISBN 0747402558.
  • Patterson, Annabel. 1984. Censorship and Interpretation: The Conditions of Writing and Reading in Early Modern England. Reprint ed. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991. ISBN 0-299-09954-7.
  • Quillian, William H. Hamlet and the New Poetic: James Joyce and T. S. Eliot. Ann Arbor, Michigan:UMI Research Press, 1983.
  • Rosenberg, Marvin. 1992. The Masks of Hamlet. London: Associated University Presses. ISBN 0-87413-480-3.
  • Rowse, Alfred Leslie. 1963. William Shakespeare: A Biography. New York: Harper & Row. Reprinted New York : Barnes & Noble Books, 1995. ISBN 1-56619-804-6.
  • Rust, Jennifer."Wittenberg and Melancholic Allegory: The Reformation and Its Discontents in Hamlet." Shakespeare and the Culture of Christianity in Early Modern England. Ed. Dennis Taylor and David Beauregard. New York: Fordham University Press, 2003. ISBN 0-8232-2284-5.
  • Shoemaker, Neille. 1965. "Aesthetic Criticism of Hamlet". Shakespeare Quarterly 16:$-$.
  • Showalter, Elaine. 1985. "Representing Ophelia: Women, Madness, and the Responsibilities of Feminist Criticism." In Shakespeare and the Question of Theory. Ed. Patricia Parker and Geoffrey Hartman. New York and London: Methuen. ISBN 0-416-36930-8. 77–94.
  • Stoll, Elmer Edgar. 1919. Hamlet: An Historical and Comparative Study. Temecula, California: Reprint Services Corporation, 1992. ISBN 0-7812-7271-8.
  • Vickers, Brian, ed. 1974a. Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage. Volume one (1623–1692). New ed. London: Routledge, 1995. ISBN 0-415-13404-8.
  • ———. 1974b. Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage. Volume four (1753–1765). New ed. London: Routledge, 1995. ISBN 0-415-13407-2.
  • ———. 1974c. Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage. Volume five (1765–1774). New ed. London: Routledge, 1995. ISBN 0-415-13408-0.
  • Ward, David. 1992. "The King and 'Hamlet'". Shakespeare Quarterly 43.3: 280–302.
  • Wilson, John Dover. 1932. The Essential Shakespeare: A Biographical Adventure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Winstanley, Lilian. 1921. Hamlet and the Scottish succession, Being an Examination of the Relations of the Play of Hamlet to the Scottish Succession and the Essex Conspiracy. London: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted Philadelphia : R. West, 1977. ISBN 0-8492-2912-X.
  • Wofford, Susanne L. 1994. "A Critical History of Hamlet." In Hamlet: Complete, Authoritative Text with Biographical and Historical Contexts, Critical History, and Essays from Five Contemporary Critical Perspectives. Boston: Bedford Books of St. Martins Press. ISBN 0-312-08986-4.

Read more about this topic:  Critical Approaches To Hamlet

Famous quotes containing the word reading:

    Much reading is an oppression of the mind, and extinguishes the natural candle, which is the reason of so many senseless scholars in the world.
    William Penn (1644–1718)

    I have not placed reading before praying because I regard it more important, but because, in order to pray aright, we must understand what we are praying for.
    Angelina Grimké (1805–1879)