In mathematics, an algebraic variety V in projective space is a complete intersection if it can be defined by the vanishing of the number of homogeneous polynomials indicated by its codimension. That is, if the dimension of an algebraic variety V is m and it lies in projective space Pn, there are homogeneous polynomials
- Fi(X0, ..., Xn)
in the homogeneous coordinates Xj, with
- 1 ≤ i ≤ n − m,
such that on V we have
- Fi(X0, ..., Xn) = 0
and for no other points of projective space do all the Fi all take the value 0. Geometrically each Fi separately define a hypersurface Hi; the intersection of the Hi should be V, no more and no less.
In fact the dimension of the intersection will always be at least m, assuming as usual in algebraic geometry that the scalars form an algebraically closed field, such as the complex numbers. There will be hypersurfaces containing V, and any set of them will have intersection containing V. The question is then, can n − m be chosen to have no further intersection? This condition is in fact hard to satisfy, as soon as n ≥ 3 and n − m ≥ 2. When the codimension n − m = 1 then automatically V is a hypersurface and there is nothing to prove.
Read more about Complete Intersection: Example of A Space Curve That Is Not A Complete Intersection, Multidegree, General Position, A Connection To Number Theory
Famous quotes containing the words complete and/or intersection:
“In the course of the actual attainment of selfish endsan attainment conditioned in this way by universalitythere is formed a system of complete interdependence, wherein the livelihood, happiness, and legal status of one man is interwoven with the livelihood, happiness, and rights of all. On this system, individual happiness, etc. depend, and only in this connected system are they actualized and secured.”
—Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (17701831)
“If we are a metaphor of the universe, the human couple is the metaphor par excellence, the point of intersection of all forces and the seed of all forms. The couple is time recaptured, the return to the time before time.”
—Octavio Paz (b. 1914)