Language and Features
This section provides a comparison of the languages in terms of features they may or may not offer, or, put differently, properties they may or may not have. The absence of a feature should not automatically be regarded as a disadvantage for the given language. Sometimes features may be excluded because the language designers view them as specifically detrimental: in other cases, the designers may have viewed the feature as something that would be nice to have but not worth the added language complexity.
Read more about this topic: Comparison Of C Sharp And Java
Famous quotes containing the words language and, language and/or features:
“Perspective, as its inventor remarked, is a beautiful thing. What horrors of damp huts, where human beings languish, may not become picturesque through aerial distance! What hymning of cancerous vices may we not languish over as sublimest art in the safe remoteness of a strange language and artificial phrase! Yet we keep a repugnance to rheumatism and other painful effects when presented in our personal experience.”
—George Eliot [Mary Ann (or Marian)
“The writer’s language is to some degree the product of his own action; he is both the historian and the agent of his own language.”
—Paul De Man (1919–1983)
“All visible objects, man, are but as pasteboard masks. But in each event—in the living act, the undoubted deed—there, some unknown but still reasoning thing puts forth the mouldings of its features from behind the unreasoning mask. If man will strike, strike through the mask!”
—Herman Melville (1819–1891)