Children's Song - Categories

Categories

Pioneers of the academic study of children’s culture Iona and Peter Opie divided children’s songs into those taught to children by adults, which when part of a traditional culture they saw as nursery rhymes, and those that children taught to each other, which formed part of the independent culture of childhood. A further use of the term is for songs written for the entertainment, or education, of children, usually in the modern era. In practice none of these categories is entirely discreet, since, for example, children often reuse and adapt nursery rhymes and many songs now considered as traditional were deliberately written by adults for commercial ends.

The Opies further divided nursery rhymes into a number of classes, including:

  • Amusements (including action songs)
  • Counting rhymes
  • Lullabies
  • Riddles

Playground or children’s street rhymes they sub-divided into two major groups, those associated with games and those that were entertainments, the second category including:

  • Improper verses
  • Jingles
  • Joke rhymes
  • Nonsense verse
  • Macabre rhymes
  • Popular songs
  • Parodies
  • Slogans
  • Tongue-twisters

In addition since the advent of popular music publication in the nineteenth century a large number of songs have been produced for and often adopted by children. Many of these follow the form of nursery rhymes and children’s songs and have sometimes been adopted as such. They can be seen to have arisen from a number of sources including:

  • Film
  • Publishing
  • Recording

Read more about this topic:  Children's Song

Famous quotes containing the word categories:

    all the categories which we employ to describe conscious mental acts, such as ideas, purposes, resolutions, and so on, can be applied to ... these latent states.
    Sigmund Freud (1856–1939)

    All cultural change reduces itself to a difference of categories. All revolutions, whether in the sciences or world history, occur merely because spirit has changed its categories in order to understand and examine what belongs to it, in order to possess and grasp itself in a truer, deeper, more intimate and unified manner.
    Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770–1831)

    The analogy between the mind and a computer fails for many reasons. The brain is constructed by principles that assure diversity and degeneracy. Unlike a computer, it has no replicative memory. It is historical and value driven. It forms categories by internal criteria and by constraints acting at many scales, not by means of a syntactically constructed program. The world with which the brain interacts is not unequivocally made up of classical categories.
    Gerald M. Edelman (b. 1928)