Belief Bias - Syllogisms Within Reasoning

Syllogisms Within Reasoning

Belief bias emanates due to a conflict occurring between belief and logic reasoning (Sa, West & Stanovich, 1999). These conclusions within belief bias contain syllogisms and premises . Syllogism is a form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn from two given premises (Morely, Evans & Handley, 2004). For example, if this syllogism is broken down it becomes:

Major Premises: All dogs are animals, Minor Premises: All animals have four legs Conclusions: All dogs have four legs

Therefore, belief bias occurs when a person’s personal beliefs and knowledge do not agree with the conclusion given (Markovits, Saelen & Forgues, 2009). This example above is correct and so would be considered valid and believable. However, this example below does not make sense and therefore is invalid and unbelievable:

Major Premises: All poodles are dogs Minor Premises: Some dogs are animals Conclusion:Some poodles are animals.

Read more about this topic:  Belief Bias

Famous quotes containing the word reasoning:

    “Now what I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else. You can only form the minds of reasoning animals upon Facts: nothing else will ever be of service to them.”
    Charles Dickens (1812–1870)