Previous Points Distribution (until 2008)
Points are awarded as follows:
| Tournament category | Total financial commitment€ |
W | F | SF (3rd/4th) |
QF | R16 | R32 | R64 | R128 | Additional qualifying points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam | $6,784,000 to $9,943,000 | 1000 | 700 | 450 | 250 | 150 | 75 | 35 | 5 | 15 |
| Tennis Masters Cup | $4,450,000 | 750^ 550m |
500^ 300m |
300^ 100m |
(100 for each round robin match win, +200 for a semifinal win, +250 for the final win) |
|||||
| ATP Masters Series | $2,450,000 to $3,450,000 | 500 | 350 | 225 | 125 | 75 | 35 | 5 (20) | (5) | 15* |
| Olympics | 400 | 280 | 205/155 | 100 | 50 | 25 | 5 | |||
| International Series Gold | $1,000,000 | 300 | 210 | 135 | 75 | 25 | 0 (15) | (0) | 10* | |
| International Series Gold | $800,000 | 250 | 175 | 110 | 60 | 25 | 0 (15) | (0) | 10* | |
| International Series | $1,000,000 | 250 | 175 | 110 | 60 | 25 | 0 (15) | (0) | 10* | |
| International Series | $800,000 | 225 | 155 | 100 | 55 | 20 | 0 (10) | (0) | 10* | |
| International Series | $600,000 | 200 | 140 | 90 | 50 | 15 (20) | 0 (10) | (0) | 5 | |
| International Series | $400,000 | 175 | 120 | 75 | 40 | 15 | 0 | 5 | ||
| Challenger | $150,000+H | 100 | 70 | 45 | 23 | 10 | 0 | 3 | ||
| Challenger | $150,000 | 90 | 63 | 40 | 21 | 9 | 0 | 3 | ||
| Challenger | $125,000 | 80 | 56 | 36 | 19 | 8 | 0 | 3 | ||
| Challenger | $100,000 | 70 | 49 | 31 | 16 | 7 | 0 | 3 | ||
| Challenger | $75,000 | 60 | 42 | 27 | 14 | 6 | 0 | 3 | ||
| Challenger | $50,000 or $35,000+H | 55 | 38 | 24 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 2 | ||
| Futures | $15,000+H | 24 | 16 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0 | |||
| Futures | $15,000 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | |||
| Futures | $10,000 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |||
Read more about this topic: ATP Rankings, Ranking Method
Famous quotes containing the words previous, points and/or distribution:
“Our talk of external things, our very notion of things, is just a conceptual apparatus that helps us to foresee and control the triggerings of our sensory receptors in the light of previous triggering of our sensory receptors.”
—Willard Van Orman Quine (b. 1908)
“The three main medieval points of view regarding universals are designated by historians as realism, conceptualism, and nominalism. Essentially these same three doctrines reappear in twentieth-century surveys of the philosophy of mathematics under the new names logicism, intuitionism, and formalism.”
—Willard Van Orman Quine (b. 1908)
“The man who pretends that the distribution of income in this country reflects the distribution of ability or character is an ignoramus. The man who says that it could by any possible political device be made to do so is an unpractical visionary. But the man who says that it ought to do so is something worse than an ignoramous and more disastrous than a visionary: he is, in the profoundest Scriptural sense of the word, a fool.”
—George Bernard Shaw (1856–1950)