Arizona Supreme Court

The Arizona Supreme Court is the state supreme court of the U.S. state of Arizona. It consists of a chief justice, a vice chief justice, and three associate justices. Each justice is appointed by the governor of Arizona from a list recommended by a bipartisan commission. Justices stand for retention in an election two years after their appointment and then every six years. They must retire at age 70.

The chief justice is chosen for a five-year term by the court, and is eligible for re-election. He or she supervises the administration of all the inferior courts. He or she is Chairman of the Commission on Appellate Court Appointments, which nominates candidates to fill vacancies in the appellate courts. If the Governor fails to appoint one of the nominated candidates within sixty days of their names being submitted to her or him, the Chief Justice makes the appointment.

The Vice Chief Justice, who acts as Chief Justice in the latter's "absence or incapacity," is chosen by the court for a term determined by the court.

The jurisdiction of the court is prescribed by Article VI, Section 5 of the Arizona Constitution. Most of the appeals heard by the court go through the Arizona Court of Appeals, except for death penalty cases, over which the Arizona Supreme Court has sole appellate jurisdiction. The court also has original jurisdiction in a few other circumstances as outlined in the Arizona Constitution. A quorum is three, but the whole court must sit in order to declare a law unconstitutional.

Read more about Arizona Supreme CourtJustices, Membership History, Chief Justices

Other articles related to "arizona, arizona supreme court, court":

State Bar Of Arizona
... The State Bar of Arizona is the integrated (mandatory) bar association of the U.S ... state of Arizona ... The Arizona Supreme Court licenses lawyers, while the State Bar administers the regulation of the practice of law ...
Walton V. Arizona - "Heinous, Cruel, or Depraved" Aggravating Factor Is Not Unconstitutionally Vague - Counterarguments For The Court's Ruling
... spite of these developments, Walton contended that the Arizona Supreme Court's definitions had still been arbitrarily applied in his case ... The Court recast this argument as a challenge to the proportionality review the Arizona Supreme Court had conducted, and then dismissed it because it deemed proportionality review to be unnecessary in the ... Furthermore, "the Arizona Supreme Court plainly undertook its proportionality review in good faith and found that Walton's sentence was proportional to the sentence imposed in cases ...
State Bar Of Arizona - History
... The first Arizona wide bar association was created in 1895 ... the Territory and in 1904 strongly promoted the admission of Arizona as a state into the Union ... In 1906 the Arizona Bar Association was first incorporated ...
Sandra Day O'Connor College Of Law - Notable Alumni
... Michael Daly Hawkins ('70) - Senior Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Roslyn O ... Silver ('71) - Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Arizona Tom Collins ('72) - former County Attorney for Maricopa County, Arizona Ruth McGregor ('74) - former Chief ... Congressman, Arizona's 4th congressional district Charles G ...
Andrew Thomas (prosecutor) - Maricopa County Attorney - Arizona State Bar Investigations
... In 2008, the State Bar of Arizona launched an investigation of Thomas ... In response, Thomas filed a Petition for Special Action with the Arizona Supreme Court in an effort to halt the investigation ... The Arizona State Bar filed a response noting that "a lawyer who happens to be an elected public officer.. ...

Famous quotes containing the words court, arizona and/or supreme:

    We should have learnt by now that laws and court decisions can only point the way. They can establish criteria of right and wrong. And they can provide a basis for rooting out the evils of bigotry and racism. But they cannot wipe away centuries of oppression and injustice—however much we might desire it.
    Hubert H. Humphrey (1911–1978)

    Desert rains are usually so definitely demarked that the story of the man who washed his hands in the edge of an Arizona thunder shower without wetting his cuffs seems almost credible.
    —Administration in the State of Ariz, U.S. public relief program (1935-1943)

    ... the outcome of the Clarence Thomas hearings and his subsequent appointment to the Supreme Court shows how misguided, narrow notions of racial solidarity that suppress dissent and critique can lead black folks to support individuals who will not protect their rights.
    bell hooks (b. c. 1955)